Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Help patients find suitable doctors based on symptoms, specialty, location, and doctor ratings. Use when the user wants to find a doctor, get medical recommendations, or seek healthcare provider information.
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Help patients find suitable doctors based on symptoms, specialty, location, and doctor ratings.
Activate on: "找医生", "推荐医生", "看什么科", "医院", "专家", "挂号", "病症", doctor search requests.
Before acting: Clarify:
| Symptoms/Condition | Suggested Specialty | |-------------------|---------------------| | Fever, cold, flu | Internal Medicine / General Practice | | Stomach pain, digestion issues | Gastroenterology | | Headache, dizziness | Neurology | | Chest pain, palpitations | Cardiology | | Skin rash, allergies | Dermatology | | Bone/joint pain | Orthopedics | | Children's illness | Pediatrics | | Women's health | Gynecology | | Eye problems | Ophthalmology | | Ear/nose/throat | ENT (Otolaryngology) | | Dental issues | Dentistry | | Mental health concerns | Psychiatry / Psychology |
Essential factors:
Additional considerations:
For each recommended doctor:
Doctor Name - Specialty, Hospital
⚠️ Medical Disclaimer:
User: "我头痛应该看什么科?" Response: 头痛建议先看神经内科。如果伴随视力问题看眼科,外伤引起看神经外科。
User: "帮我找北京看胃病好的医生" Response: 推荐消化内科医生列表,包含医院、专长、评价等]
User: "孩子发烧了挂什么号?" Response: 建议挂儿科。如果高烧不退或精神萎靡,建议直接去儿童医院急诊。
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +36 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.