▸case-01 The migration strategy document asserts that changing our session store won't affect active user logins and that unit test coverage stayed above 90%. Please audit the central claims in this document against primary project artifacts. Structure your output by sorting each evaluated statement into three lists: confirmed assertions along with their verification paths, refuted assertions backed by counter-observations, and unverified assumptions detailing why they could not be tested and how to validate them in the future. | fail→fail | 18,655 | 13,219 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,306 | 708 | -69% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-02 A subagent submitted a pull request summary stating that all edge cases in the payment gateway retry logic are covered by integration tests and that backward compatibility is preserved. Please double-check these statements using independent verification rather than trusting the summary. Format your findings by bucketing each audited assertion into confirmed (showing how you re-proved it), refuted (highlighting contradicting observations), or assumption (explaining what prevents verification today and what would be needed to verify it). | fail→fail | 45,031 | 14,219 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,389 | 796 | -77% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-03 During an audit of the PostgreSQL database connection pool in pg_pool.py, we identified an unhandled socket timeout exception in reconnect_retry(). Please draft the Python bug fix for reconnect_retry() to catch socket.timeout and retry with exponential backoff. | pass→fail | 16,573 | 15,566 | -6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,613 | 831 | -68% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-04 We are designing a new REST endpoint /api/v2/subscriptions/cancel for the billing service. Please write the OpenAPI 3.0 YAML specification for this endpoint, including request parameters and 200/400/401 HTTP response schemas. | pass→pass | 20,020 | 30,662 | +53% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,158 | 4,564 | +45% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-05 We need an end-user guide for developers setting up local development environment variables in .env.example for the auth-service. Please write a clear step-by-step tutorial explaining how developers configure local database URLs, JWT secrets, and Redis connection strings. | pass→fail | 20,769 | 14,473 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,006 | 764 | -75% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-06 A lane report for redis_cache.py claims that cache key expiration defaults to 300 seconds. The inline docstring in redis_cache.py says "default ttl=300", but the actual runtime code in RedisCache.__init__ assigns self.ttl = 600. Audit this claim by selecting primary sources according to evidence strength. Present your findings in the three claim audit lists (confirmed, refuted, assumption). | pass→pass | 7,538 | 10,160 | +35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,414 | 1,189 | -16% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-07 An engineer's memory from last sprint asserts that auth_middleware.py bypasses JWT verification for /healthz endpoints. However, the test suite in tests/test_auth.py and the source code in auth_middleware.py both enforce JWT check on /healthz. Audit this claim and structure your findings into confirmed assertions, refuted assertions, and assumptions. | pass→pass | 16,037 | 11,109 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,043 | 1,651 | +58% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-08 A code review note states that rate_limiter.py allows up to 100 requests per minute based on code inspection. Re-derive this claim using an independent verification path rather than repeating code inspection. Organize your analysis into confirmed, refuted, and assumption lists. | pass→fail | 15,640 | 14,916 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,840 | 843 | -54% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-09 A pull request summary claims that order_processor.go handles database deadlocks gracefully based on TestOrderDeadlock passing. Re-derive this claim using an independent path rather than relying on the test execution alone. Group findings into confirmed assertions, refuted assertions, and assumptions. | fail→fail | 21,575 | 15,185 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,542 | 725 | -71% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-10 A performance report for search_index.rs claims: 1) index lookup time dropped from 45ms to 12ms (which determines if we deploy to production or delay), 2) total source lines of code decreased by 14 lines, and 3) internal helper function count changed from 8 to 7. Audit these claims, focusing strictly on decision-material assertions while filtering out decorative metrics. Present findings in confirmed, refuted, and assumption lists. | pass→fail | 16,615 | 16,767 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,127 | 986 | -54% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-11 A refactoring report presents three claims about payment_processor.py: Claim A sounds extremely plausible and aligns perfectly with our architectural goals (that payment retries never duplicate charges); Claim B seems unlikely (that error logging caught all 500 responses); Claim C is neutral. Audit these claims, ensuring you select the starting audit order based on narrative fit. Structure output using confirmed, refuted, and assumption categories. | pass→fail | 20,381 | 15,824 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,705 | 1,017 | -62% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-12 A security audit report claims that the third-party token validation service auth-vendor-cloud handled 10,000 requests without failing during yesterday's traffic spike. We do not have access to vendor internal server logs or raw request metrics to re-derive this today. Evaluate this claim and organize findings into confirmed, refuted, and assumption sections. | fail→pass | 17,200 | 15,003 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,874 | 2,275 | +21% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-13 A subagent claims that the new user_service_v2 microservice maintains full backward compatibility with user_service_v1 API clients, providing a current-code test mock that passes as evidence. Audit this backward compatibility claim against primary standards. Output findings using confirmed, refuted, and assumption lists. | fail→pass | 15,349 | 17,357 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,670 | 2,663 | +59% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-14 A deployment summary asserts that version 2.4.0 of db_migrator is fully forward-compatible with database schema version 2.3.0. Audit this claim against released artifacts. Present findings in confirmed, refuted, and assumption categories. | fail→fail | 19,109 | 15,102 | -21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,191 | 745 | -66% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-15 A developer working on an uncommitted local branch asserts that parser.ts currently processes 500 records per second, which meets the release gate threshold of 450 records/sec. Audit this numeric performance claim under local worktree conditions. Present output in confirmed, refuted, and assumption lists. | fail→fail | 17,061 | 16,973 | -1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,966 | 770 | -61% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-16 A release audit report claims that commit a1b2c3d achieved 94.2% test coverage across services/billing. Audit this specific numeric claim. Organize your report into confirmed, refuted, and assumption sections. | pass→fail | 18,800 | 15,956 | -15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,169 | 855 | -61% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-17 An audit of event_bus.py evaluated three claims: Claim 1 (event latency is under 5ms) was confirmed; Claim 2 (zero dropped events during broker restart) was refuted by log traces showing 42 dropped events; Claim 3 (memory usage under load) could not be tested and remains unverified. Format your audit report into confirmed, refuted, and assumption sections. | fail→pass | 8,486 | 10,092 | +19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 676 | 1,460 | +116% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-18 A code comment in crypto_utils.go claims that EncryptAES uses 256-bit key sizes. However, unit tests in crypto_utils_test.go initialize 128-bit keys and assertion fails when given 256-bit keys. Audit this assertion against evidence hierarchy. Structure output into confirmed, refuted, and assumption lists. | pass→fail | 15,060 | 13,117 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,745 | 736 | -58% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-19 A disaster recovery plan claims that rolling back k8s-deploy.yaml from release v3 to v2 will not cause schema mismatches or data corruption in orders_db. Audit this rollback compatibility assertion. Format output into confirmed, refuted, and assumption lists. | fail→fail | 16,514 | 15,571 | -6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,910 | 775 | -59% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-20 A cluster upgrade plan asserts that nodes running node_agent v1.8 and v1.9 can operate concurrently in a mixed-version cluster without dropping gRPC connections. Audit this mixed-version compatibility statement. Format output into confirmed, refuted, and assumption lists. | fail→fail | 17,395 | 14,991 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,031 | 758 | -63% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-21 An optimization report for image_pipeline.cpp states that thread pool processing latency dropped from 100ms to 40ms (meeting the 50ms requirement for production launch), and also notes that variable names were shortened in 23 places and comments were updated across 5 files. Audit these statements and produce an audit report bucketed into confirmed, refuted, and assumption lists. | fail→fail | 18,601 | 15,385 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,190 | 781 | -64% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-22 A standup claim states that export_worker.py handles CSV exports without memory leaks because the developer remembers testing a 1GB file last month. No benchmark logs or test scripts exist in the repository to confirm this. Audit this assertion and group findings into confirmed, refuted, and assumption lists. | pass→pass | 18,564 | 16,892 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,111 | 2,417 | +14% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-23 A pull request description asserts that upgrading the ORM dependency from v4 to v5 in package.json requires zero migration scripts and supports seamless in-place upgrade. Audit this upgrade claim. Present your output bucketed into confirmed assertions, refuted assertions, and assumptions. | fail→fail | 19,756 | 15,266 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,418 | 768 | -68% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-24 A protobuf schema change summary claims that adding new field tenant_id = 4 to user_event.proto is forward-compatible with legacy v1 consumer services. Audit this claim against project artifacts and present output in confirmed, refuted, and assumption lists. | fail→fail | 16,390 | 15,590 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,766 | 852 | -52% | 0 | 0 | — |
▸case-25 An audit of cache_invalidation.ts revealed that invalidation events fire within 10ms (confirmed via logs), invalidation tokens expire after 60s (refuted by integration tests showing token persistence for 300s), and max cache memory is unverified. Format your final audit report using confirmed, refuted, and assumption lists. | fail→pass | 8,096 | 9,271 | +15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 646 | 1,370 | +112% | 0 | 0 | — |