Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →hashgraph-online/discuss-phase
融合 GSD discuss-phase 与 gstack office-hours 的预编码设计讨论技能。 在 /team-intake 之后、/team-plan 之前,通过苏格拉底式质疑捕获灰色地带、 用户偏好和关键假设,产出 CONTEXT.md 供后续规划和实现消费。
Passed 20 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 9 of 22 without it.
and 9 more in the full report
11 fixed9 passed either way2 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 11 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
When framing user needs for a newly proposed workflow automation tool, what forcing question examines current user workarounds?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The output asks who the target users are and what their current alternative solutions are. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
/team-intake 完成后、/team-plan 之前推荐触发。逐项质疑需求中的灰色地带,引导用户做出偏好选择。适用于用户在场、可以即时回答的场景。
先扫描代码库识别现有模式和约束,把代码中已有的事实作为假设基础,仅对代码无法回答的灰色地带提问。适用于代码库已有大量存量逻辑的迭代场景。
收集输入:读取 /team-intake 的产出(PRD、需求简报),提取目标、范围、约束和待确认项。
识别灰色地带:按以下维度自动扫描未锁定的决策点:
Forcing Questions(来自 gstack office-hours 方法论):
逐项讨论:每个灰色地带呈现为:
test cases passed, vs 9 / 22 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.