Gather, classify, prioritize, respond to, and act on developer documentation feedback from page feedback, support issues, community forums, field notes, sentiment, surveys, user councils, bug reports, and user follow-up.
SkillScore95Maintained
Automatic
◆Doc Ops pack
Last verified 8/16/2026
What it changes
Passed 21 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 20 of 22 without it.
Without skill91%
With skill95%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed
Follow-up section includes evidence to collect.
Classification explicitly includes duplicate status.
Recommends verifying SDK behavior before updating docs.
and 3 more in the full report
2 fixed19 passed either way0 still failing1 broke
Pass-rate lift
+5 pp
Tokens
+11%
Agent turns
0%
Response time
-22%
Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 8/16/2026v121 of 22 cases passed with skill
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
See it in action
One of 2 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
1 of 2
Prompt
We just got an angry note in our docs feedback widget: 'The REST API pagination parameter cursor is completely undocumented and the example returns a 400 error!' Can you evaluate this feedback for our backlog? I need an assessment showing a summary of the complaint, classification of the issue, actionability details, priority ranking, proposed resolution or routing, and a plan for following up with the submitter.
What was checked, without and with the skill
Checked
Without skill
With skill
Classification explicitly states validity status as valid, invalid, or needs research.
Missed
Passed
Classification explicitly includes duplicate status.
Missed
Passed
Feedback summary includes feedback source and user type.
Missed
Passed
Follow-up section includes evidence to collect.
Missed
Passed
case-01 · gemini-3.6-flash · 8/16/2026 · answers are capped and redacted
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
SKILL.md42 linessingle file
Docs Feedback Triage
Use this skill to turn developer documentation feedback into valid, actionable, prioritized work. It helps agents avoid treating every comment as equal while preserving user evidence.
This skill is derived from Docs for Developers: An Engineer's Field Guide to Technical Writing, especially Chapter 8, "Gathering and integrating feedback." It is expanded with paraphrased guidance from Christopher Gales and the Splunk Documentation Team's The Product Is Docs: Writing Technical Documentation in a Product Development Group, especially Chapter 5, "Customer Feedback and Community," Chapter 18, "Working with Customer Support," and Chapter 20, "Working with the Field." Do not copy book prose into user outputs. Source: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4842-7217-6
Quick Start
Load guidelines.md to choose the smallest useful reference set.
Identify feedback source, affected doc, user impact, response need, and whether the issue is docs-owned.
Test validity, actionability, and importance before recommending work.
Use workflows/triage-doc-feedback.md for a full triage pass.
Close the loop with users or source teams when the feedback changes product, support, or docs work.
Default Output
When triaging feedback, return:
Feedback summary - source, affected doc, user type, and reported problem.