Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Performance optimizer for loops, DB queries, rendering, and batch operations. Catches N+1 queries, missing indexes, and unnecessary re-renders.
.claude/skills/hashgraph-online-perf/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 254% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | 57% | 0% |
| case-01 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | -61% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | -56% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | 398% | 0% |
See references/performance.md for the full checklist.
| Excuse | Rebuttal | What to do instead | |--------|----------|--------------------| | "Premature optimization is the root of all evil" | Knuth said "about 97% of the time" — the other 3% matters. N+1 queries are never premature. | Check for N+1 queries and missing indexes before merging. | | "It works fine on my machine" | Your machine is not production. Profile under realistic conditions. | Run the perf checklist against realistic data volumes. | | "We can optimize later" | Performance debt is invisible until it's catastrophic. Measure now. | Add a benchmark or load test for the critical path today. |
Before claiming performance review is complete, show ALL applicable:
await or stream usage (no sync fs/net)"Looks fine" is not a review. Show the query or the code path.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-06 | pass→fail | 15,297 | 24,202 | +58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,923 | 4,582 | +57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | pass→fail | 24,827 | 8,134 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,763 | 1,470 | -61% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 16,715 | 15,881 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,848 | 2,691 | -6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→fail | 30,982 | 8,593 | -72% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,181 | 2,268 | -56% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 8,384 | 23,187 | +177% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,113 | 3,937 | +254% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→fail | 2,183 | 9,441 | +332% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 344 | 1,713 | +398% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 15,268 | 8,027 | -47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,902 | 2,412 | +27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 12,199 | 14,463 | +19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,224 | 2,625 | +18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 22,416 | 17,036 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,064 | 3,093 | +1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 13,897 | 9,465 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,418 | 2,554 | +6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 13,862 | 9,845 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,811 | 2,688 | +48% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 13,435 | 16,203 | +21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,297 | 2,868 | +25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 25,768 | 17,805 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,945 | 3,243 | +10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 20,087 | 15,708 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,569 | 2,833 | +10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | 16,975 | 10,152 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,068 | 2,572 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 15,747 | 9,192 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,555 | 2,414 | -6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | 20,640 | 12,701 | -38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,364 | 2,083 | -12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 18,743 | 5,394 | -71% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,130 | 1,861 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 21,596 | 15,644 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,877 | 2,710 | -6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 16,416 | 13,551 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,024 | 2,395 | +18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 17,953 | 14,651 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,261 | 2,755 | +22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 18,688 | 9,683 | -48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,230 | 2,661 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 13,086 | 14,914 | +14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,185 | 2,632 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-24 | pass→pass | 17,204 | 8,669 | -50% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,097 | 2,502 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 24 cases were attempted. The headline lift of -33 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 24 comparable cases. 4 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.