Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Protected Health Information (PHI) and Personally Identifiable Information (PII) compliance patterns for healthcare applications. Covers data classification, access control, audit trails, encryption, and common leak vectors.
.claude/skills/healthcare-phi-compliance/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Patterns for protecting patient data, clinician data, and financial data in healthcare applications. Applicable to HIPAA (US), DISHA (India), GDPR (EU), and general healthcare data protection.
Healthcare data protection operates on three layers: classification (what is sensitive), access control (who can see it), and audit (who did see it).
PHI (Protected Health Information) — any data that can identify a patient AND relates to their health: patient name, date of birth, address, phone, email, national ID numbers (SSN, Aadhaar, NHS number), medical record numbers, diagnoses, medications, lab results, imaging, insurance policy and claim details, appointment and admission records, or any combination of the above.
PII (Non-patient-sensitive data) in healthcare systems: clinician/staff personal details, doctor fee structures and payout amounts, employee salary and bank details, vendor payment information.
sqlALTER TABLE patients ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY; -- Scope access by facility CREATE POLICY "staff_read_own_facility" ON patients FOR SELECT TO authenticated USING (facility_id IN ( SELECT facility_id FROM staff_assignments WHERE user_id = auth.uid() AND role IN ('doctor','nurse','lab_tech','admin') )); -- Audit log: insert-only (tamper-proof) CREATE POLICY "audit_insert_only" ON audit_log FOR INSERT TO authenticated WITH CHECK (user_id = auth.uid()); CREATE POLICY "audit_no_modify" ON audit_log FOR UPDATE USING (false); CREATE POLICY "audit_no_delete" ON audit_log FOR DELETE USING (false);
Every PHI access or modification must be logged:
typescriptinterface AuditEntry { timestamp: string; user_id: string; patient_id: string; action: 'create' | 'read' | 'update' | 'delete' | 'print' | 'export'; resource_type: string; resource_id: string; changes?: { before: object; after: object }; ip_address: string; session_id: string; }
Error messages: Never include patient-identifying data in error messages thrown to the client. Log details server-side only.
Console output: Never log full patient objects. Use opaque internal record IDs (UUIDs) — not medical record numbers, national IDs, or names.
URL parameters: Never put patient-identifying data in query strings or path segments that could appear in logs or browser history. Use opaque UUIDs only.
Browser storage: Never store PHI in localStorage or sessionStorage. Keep PHI in memory only, fetch on demand.
Service role keys: Never use the service_role key in client-side code. Always use the anon/publishable key and let RLS enforce access.
Logs and monitoring: Never log full patient records. Use opaque record IDs only (not medical record numbers). Sanitize stack traces before sending to error tracking services.
Mark PHI/PII columns at the schema level:
sqlCOMMENT ON COLUMN patients.name IS 'PHI: patient_name'; COMMENT ON COLUMN patients.dob IS 'PHI: date_of_birth'; COMMENT ON COLUMN patients.aadhaar IS 'PHI: national_id'; COMMENT ON COLUMN doctor_payouts.amount IS 'PII: financial';
Before every deployment:
typescript// BAD — leaks PHI in error throw new Error(`Patient ${patient.name} not found in ${patient.facility}`); // GOOD — generic error, details logged server-side with opaque IDs only logger.error('Patient lookup failed', { recordId: patient.id, facilityId }); throw new Error('Record not found');
sql-- Doctor at Facility A cannot see Facility B patients CREATE POLICY "facility_isolation" ON patients FOR SELECT TO authenticated USING (facility_id IN ( SELECT facility_id FROM staff_assignments WHERE user_id = auth.uid() )); -- Test: login as doctor-facility-a, query facility-b patients -- Expected: 0 rows returned
typescript// BAD — logs identifiable patient data console.log('Processing patient:', patient); // GOOD — logs only opaque internal record ID console.log('Processing record:', patient.id); // Note: even patient.id should be an opaque UUID, not a medical record number
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 21 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +23 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 21 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.