Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Automate HelpDesk tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): list tickets, manage views, use canned responses, and configure custom fields. Always search tools first for current schemas.
.claude/skills/helpdesk-automation/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Automate HelpDesk ticketing operations through Composio's HelpDesk toolkit via Rube MCP.
RUBE_MANAGE_CONNECTIONS with toolkit helpdeskRUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS first to get current tool schemasGet Rube MCP: Add https://rube.app/mcp as an MCP server in your client configuration. No API keys needed — just add the endpoint and it works.
RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS respondsRUBE_MANAGE_CONNECTIONS with toolkit helpdeskWhen to use: User wants to retrieve, browse, or paginate through support tickets
Tool sequence:
HELPDESK_LIST_TICKETS - List tickets with sorting and pagination Required]Key parameters:
silo: Ticket folder - 'tickets', 'archive', 'trash', or 'spam' (default: 'tickets')sortBy: Sort field - 'createdAt', 'updatedAt', or 'lastMessageAt' (default: 'createdAt')order: Sort direction - 'asc' or 'desc' (default: 'desc')pageSize: Results per page, 1-100 (default: 20)next.value: Timestamp cursor for forward paginationnext.ID: ID cursor for forward paginationprev.value: Timestamp cursor for backward paginationprev.ID: ID cursor for backward paginationPitfalls:
next.value and next.ID from previous responseprev.value and prev.IDsilo determines which folder to list from; default is active ticketspageSize max is 100; default is 20When to use: User wants to see saved agent views for organizing tickets
Tool sequence:
HELPDESK_LIST_VIEWS - List all agent views Required]Key parameters: (none required)
Pitfalls:
When to use: User wants to list available canned (template) responses for tickets
Tool sequence:
HELPDESK_LIST_CANNED_RESPONSES - Retrieve all predefined reply templates Required]Key parameters: (none required)
Pitfalls:
When to use: User wants to view custom field definitions for the account
Tool sequence:
HELPDESK_LIST_CUSTOM_FIELDS - List all custom field definitions Required]Key parameters: (none required)
Pitfalls:
1. Call HELPDESK_LIST_TICKETS with desired silo and sortBy
2. Process the returned page of tickets
3. Extract next.value and next.ID from the response
4. Call HELPDESK_LIST_TICKETS with those cursor values for next page
5. Continue until no more cursor values are returnedActive tickets: silo='tickets'
Archived: silo='archive'
Trashed: silo='trash'
Spam: silo='spam'Forward pagination:
- Use next.value (timestamp) and next.ID from response
- Pass as next.value and next.ID parameters in next call
Backward pagination:
- Use prev.value (timestamp) and prev.ID from response
- Pass as prev.value and prev.ID parameters in next callCursor Pagination:
Silo Filtering:
Read-Only Operations:
Rate Limits:
Response Parsing:
data or data.data| Task | Tool Slug | Key Params | |------|-----------|------------| | List tickets | HELPDESK_LIST_TICKETS | silo, sortBy, order, pageSize | | List views | HELPDESK_LIST_VIEWS | (none) | | List canned responses | HELPDESK_LIST_CANNED_RESPONSES | (none) | | List custom fields | HELPDESK_LIST_CUSTOM_FIELDS | (none) |
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 17 counted toward the lift figure. The other 5 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +27 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 17 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.