Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Consulting-grade research reports: framework + final report.
.claude/skills/hezaohezao-consulting-analysis/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -2% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -9% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 120% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 413% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 238% | 0% |
Produces professional, consulting-grade research reports in Markdown, covering market analysis, consumer insights, brand strategy, financial analysis, industry research, competitive intelligence, and investment due diligence.
Operates in two phases:
visualization plan
Output adheres to McKinsey/BCG consulting voice standards.
All data in the report MUST derive from provided Data Summary or External Search Findings. No hallucinations. If data is missing, state "Data not available" rather than fabricating numbers. Every major claim must be traceable to input data.
industry research, or any consulting-grade analytical report
| Domain | Typical Dimensions | |--------|--------------------| | Market Analysis | Market size, growth, segmentation, drivers, competition | | Brand Analysis | Positioning, share, perception, strategy | | Consumer Insights | Demographics, behavior, decision journey, pain points | | Financial Analysis | Macro, industry, fundamentals, metrics, valuation | | Industry Research | Value chain, market size, competition, policy, tech | | Investment DD | Business model, financials, management, opportunity, risk | | Competitive Intel | Competitor ID, comparison, SWOT, positioning |
Select 2-4 complementary frameworks per domain:
| Category | Frameworks | |----------|-----------| | Strategic | SWOT, PESTEL, Porter's Five Forces, VRIO | | Market & Growth | STP, BCG Matrix, Ansoff, TAM-SAM-SOM, PLC | | Consumer | Decision Journey, AARRR, RFM, JTBD | | Financial | DuPont, DCF, Comparable Company, EVA | | Competitive | Benchmarking, Value Chain, Blue Ocean, Perceptual Mapping | | Industry | Gartner Hype Cycle, GE-McKinsey Matrix |
Selection principles: domain-first, complementary not overlapping, depth over breadth, data-feasible, explicitly mapped to chapters.
Each chapter must include:
| Field | Description | |-------|-------------| | Data Metric | Specific metric needed | | Data Type | Quantitative / Qualitative / Mixed | | Suggested Sources | Industry reports, gov stats, social media, etc. | | Search Keywords | Queries for data collection | | Priority | P0 (Required) / P1 (Important) / P2 (Supplementary) | | Time Range | Period data should cover |
| Field | Description | |-------|-------------| | Chart Type | Line, bar, pie, scatter, radar, heatmap, table | | Chart Title | Descriptive title | | Data Mapping | Which metrics map to axes/segments | | Argument Structure | "What → Why → So What" narrative outline |
markdown# [Research Subject] Analysis Framework ## Research Overview - **Research Subject**: [...] - **Scope**: [Geography, time range, segment] - **Analysis Domain**: [Market / Finance / Industry / ...] - **Core Research Questions**: [1-3 key questions] ## Framework Selection | Chapter | Selected Framework(s) | Application | |---------|----------------------|-------------| ## Chapter Skeleton ### 1. [Chapter Title] - **Analysis Objective**: [...] - **Analysis Logic**: [...] - **Core Hypothesis**: [...] #### Data Requirements | # | Metric | Type | Sources | Keywords | Priority | Time | #### Visualization & Content Plan [Chart plan + table design + argument structure] ## Data Collection Task List [Consolidated P0/P1 tasks for downstream data collection]
After data collection (by deep-research or other skills), synthesize into final report.
Confirm Analysis Framework + Data Summary present. Flag missing P0 data.
For each sub-chapter, follow "Visual Anchor → Data Contrast → Integrated Analysis":
Each insight must connect Data → User Psychology → Strategy Implication:
❌ Bad: "Females are 60%. Strategy: Target females."
✅ Good: "Females constitute 60% with high TGI. This suggests purchase is
driven by aesthetic validation. Consequently, media spend should pivot
to visual-heavy platforms."markdown# [Report Title] ## Abstract [Executive summary with key takeaways] ## 1. Introduction [Background, objectives, methodology] ## 2. [Body Chapter] ### 2.1 [Sub-chapter] | Metric | Brand A | Brand B | [Integrated narrative: What → Why → So What, min 200 words] ## N+1. Conclusion [Pure objective synthesis, NO bullet points, neutral tone] ## N+2. References [Formatted references]
1,000 not 1,000)1., 1.1), no "Chapter/Part/Section"prefixes
---).poirot/outputs/| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 52,661 | 40,982 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 8,253 | 8,051 | -2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 78,011 | 49,683 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 8,278 | 9,945 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 74,237 | 35,595 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 8,294 | 7,543 | -9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | 22,157 | 29,824 | +35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,310 | 6,456 | +95% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 27,385 | 43,551 | +59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,369 | 8,653 | +98% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 10,808 | 29,254 | +171% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,665 | 6,202 | +272% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 22,589 | 58,349 | +158% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,817 | 6,192 | +120% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 4,433 | 9,328 | +110% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 585 | 3,001 | +413% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | 5,528 | 9,888 | +79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 989 | 3,179 | +221% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 12,454 | 34,932 | +180% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,408 | 8,133 | +238% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 11,388 | 60,774 | +434% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,577 | 6,825 | +333% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | 10,433 | 17,460 | +67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,083 | 4,594 | +121% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 10,061 | 13,049 | +30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,479 | 3,438 | +132% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | 17,839 | 40,209 | +125% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,809 | 7,588 | +170% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | 11,230 | 30,819 | +174% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,531 | 3,179 | +108% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | 18,805 | 31,518 | +68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,822 | 6,473 | +129% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | 3,630 | 21,126 | +482% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 532 | 5,311 | +898% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | 16,913 | 36,546 | +116% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,489 | 7,412 | +198% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 40,746 | 30,923 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,200 | 6,910 | +11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | 27,086 | 44,379 | +64% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,414 | 8,944 | +103% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 19,476 | 32,599 | +67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,729 | 6,129 | +64% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 19,462 | 23,228 | +19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,374 | 6,054 | +79% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 20,162 | 33,469 | +66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,973 | 8,344 | +110% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-24 | pass→pass | 18,342 | 27,296 | +49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,326 | 6,277 | +89% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 24 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +33 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 24 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.