Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Humanize AI-generated text to bypass detection. This humanizer rewrites ChatGPT, Claude, and GPT content to sound natural and pass AI detectors like GPTZero, Turnitin, and Originality.ai. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI Writing" guide. Makes robotic AI writing undetectable and human-like.
.claude/skills/humanize-ai-text/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Comprehensive CLI for detecting and transforming AI-generated text to bypass detectors. Based on Wikipedia's Signs of AI Writing.
bash# Detect AI patterns python scripts/detect.py text.txt # Transform to human-like python scripts/transform.py text.txt -o clean.txt # Compare before/after python scripts/compare.py text.txt -o clean.txt
The analyzer checks for 16 pattern categories from Wikipedia's guide:
| Category | Examples | |----------|----------| | Citation Bugs | oaicite, turn0search, contentReference | | Knowledge Cutoff | "as of my last training", "based on available information" | | Chatbot Artifacts | "I hope this helps", "Great question!", "As an AI" | | Markdown | **bold**, ## headers, code blocks |
| Category | Examples | |----------|----------| | AI Vocabulary | delve, tapestry, landscape, pivotal, underscore, foster | | Significance Inflation | "serves as a testament", "pivotal moment", "indelible mark" | | Promotional Language | vibrant, groundbreaking, nestled, breathtaking | | Copula Avoidance | "serves as" instead of "is", "boasts" instead of "has" |
| Category | Examples | |----------|----------| | Superficial -ing | "highlighting the importance", "fostering collaboration" | | Filler Phrases | "in order to", "due to the fact that", "Additionally," | | Vague Attributions | "experts believe", "industry reports suggest" | | Challenges Formula | "Despite these challenges", "Future outlook" |
| Category | Examples | |----------|----------| | Curly Quotes | "" instead of "" (ChatGPT signature) | | Em Dash Overuse | Excessive use of — for emphasis | | Negative Parallelisms | "Not only... but also", "It's not just... it's" | | Rule of Three | Forced triplets like "innovation, inspiration, and insight" |
bashpython scripts/detect.py essay.txt python scripts/detect.py essay.txt -j # JSON output python scripts/detect.py essay.txt -s # score only echo "text" | python scripts/detect.py
Output:
bashpython scripts/transform.py essay.txt python scripts/transform.py essay.txt -o output.txt python scripts/transform.py essay.txt -a # aggressive python scripts/transform.py essay.txt -q # quiet
Auto-fixes:
)Aggressive (-a):
bashpython scripts/compare.py essay.txt python scripts/compare.py essay.txt -a -o clean.txt
Shows side-by-side detection scores before and after transformation
bash python scripts/detect.py document.txt
bash python scripts/compare.py document.txt -o document_v2.txt
bash python scripts/detect.py document_v2.txt -s
| Rating | Criteria | |--------|----------| | Very High | Citation bugs, knowledge cutoff, or chatbot artifacts present | | High | >30 issues OR >5% issue density | | Medium | >15 issues OR >2% issue density | | Low | <15 issues AND <2% density |
Edit scripts/patterns.json to add/modify:
ai_vocabulary — words to flagsignificance_inflation — puffery phrasespromotional_language — marketing speakcopula_avoidance — phrase → replacementfiller_replacements — phrase → simpler formchatbot_artifacts — phrases triggering sentence removalbash# Scan all files for f in *.txt; do echo "=== $f ===" python scripts/detect.py "$f" -s done # Transform all markdown for f in *.md; do python scripts/transform.py "$f" -a -o "${f%.md}_clean.md" -q done
Based on Wikipedia's Signs of AI Writing, maintained by WikiProject AI Cleanup. Patterns documented from thousands of AI-generated text examples.
Key insight: "LLMs use statistical algorithms to guess what should come next. The result tends toward the most statistically likely result that applies to the widest variety of cases."
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 21 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +55 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 21 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.