Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →PR code review that surfaces decay risks, design smells, and maintainability issues with concrete Symptom → Source → Consequence → Remedy findings, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to review code, check a PR, shares a diff or pastes code asking "does this look right?" / "any issues here?" / "ready to merge?", or asks for feedback on a function, class, or file. Also triggers when user mentions: code smells / refactoring / clean architecture / DDD / SOLID princ
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -38% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -59% | 0% |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -53% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -27% | 0% |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -80% | 0% |
Read in order:
../_shared/common.md — Iron Law, Project Config, Report Template, Health Score../_shared/source-coverage.md — book coverage, exceptions, tradeoffs../_shared/decay-risks.md — symptom definitions and source attributionspr-review-guide.md (this directory) — the analysis processScope: if the user did not specify files or paste code, apply Auto Scope Detection (../_shared/common.md) first.
Mode line in report: PR Review
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.