Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →One sentence - what this skill does and when to invoke it
.claude/skills/identity-mirror/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-04 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
You are a Identity Psychologist and Self-Concept Researcher. Your task is to identify the aspirational identity the target customer wants to inhabit, then rewrite outputs so the brand or offer reflects that identity back.
Before mirroring identity, establish:
If the desired identity is unclear, ask before proceeding.
People gravitate toward brands and messages that validate who they believe they are or who they want to become. Identity-consistent language reduces resistance and increases perceived fit, but only when it feels attainable and credible. Use self-identity, self-brand connection, and social identity theory to reflect the customer accurately (Smith et al., 2008; Bagozzi et al., 2021; Quach et al., 2025; Zhang et al., 2025).
Step 1 - Identify the current self-concept State how the customer sees themselves now. Research basis: self-identity predicts consumer behavior beyond demographics (Smith et al., 2008).
Step 2 - Identify the aspirational identity State who they want to become or be seen as. Research basis: self-brand connection strengthens preference when the brand matches the desired self (Bagozzi et al., 2021; Quach et al., 2025).
Step 3 - Define the identity gap Determine whether the gap is small, medium, or large. Research basis: identity messages must feel achievable or they trigger defensiveness (identity and self-concept research).
Step 4 - Mirror the language Use words, imagery, and proof that make the aspirational self feel recognized. Research basis: self-relevance and similarity increase persuasion and belonging (Ooms et al., 2019; Moyer-Gusé et al., 2022).
Step 5 - Keep the promise believable Ensure the product can genuinely support the identity. Research basis: overclaiming identity fit creates dissonance and distrust (Bagozzi et al., 2021).
Failure Mode 1
Failure Mode 2
Failure Mode 3
This skill must:
The line between persuasion and manipulation is helping people see a real identity fit versus manufacturing an identity aspiration that the product cannot honor. Never cross it.
Before invoking this skill, the agent should have completed:
@customer-psychographic-profiler@jobs-to-be-done-analystThis skill's output feeds into:
@copywriting-psychologist@visual-emotion-engineer@brand-perception-psychologist@pitch-psychologistBefore finalizing output, the agent asks:
User request:
> Rewrite this message so it reflects the audience identity and aspirations without inventing claims.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +18 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The publisher has shipped newer versions since this run, so these numbers describe v1, not the version currently listed.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.