Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Implement secure conduit architecture for OT remote access following IEC 62443 zones and conduits model, deploying jump servers, MFA-enabled gateways, session recording, and approval-based workflows to control vendor and engineer access to industrial control systems without exposing OT networks directly.
.claude/skills/implementing-conduit-security-for-ot-remote-access/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Do not use for designing the overall Purdue Model segmentation (see implementing-purdue-model-network-segmentation), for deploying IT-only remote access solutions, or for configuring local console access to PLCs.
yaml# IEC 62443 Conduit Security Architecture for OT Remote Access # All remote access terminates in DMZ - never passes through to OT directly conduit_architecture: remote_access_conduit: conduit_id: "RA-001" source_zone: "Enterprise IT (Level 4)" destination_zone: "OT DMZ (Level 3.5)" security_level_target: "SL3" components: external_gateway: type: "VPN Concentrator" location: "Enterprise DMZ" ip: "10.200.1.10" protocols: ["IPsec", "SSL-VPN"] authentication: "MFA required (certificate + OTP)" dmz_jump_server: type: "Privileged Access Workstation" location: "OT DMZ (Level 3.5)" ip: "10.10.150.20" os: "Windows Server 2022 (hardened)" controls: - "Local admin accounts disabled" - "USB ports disabled" - "Clipboard transfer disabled by default" - "Session recording enabled (all keystrokes and screen)" - "Maximum session duration: 4 hours" - "Automatic logoff after 15 minutes idle" - "Application whitelisting enforced" ot_access_gateway: type: "Industrial Remote Access Gateway" location: "OT DMZ / Level 3 boundary" ip: "10.10.150.25" controls: - "Only pre-approved destination IPs reachable" - "Protocol-level filtering (RDP, SSH, VNC only)" - "Time-limited sessions with automatic expiry" - "Approval-based access (plant manager must authorize)" data_flow: - step: 1 description: "User authenticates via enterprise VPN with MFA" source: "Remote user" destination: "VPN concentrator" protocol: "IPsec/SSL-VPN" - step: 2 description: "User connects to jump server in OT DMZ" source: "VPN tunnel" destination: "DMZ jump server" protocol: "RDP with NLA" - step: 3 description: "From jump server, user accesses specific OT system" source: "DMZ jump server" destination: "Approved OT target" protocol: "RDP/SSH/VNC" condition: "Only after manager approval and within time window" prohibited_flows: - "Direct VPN tunnel from external to Level 1/2 OT devices" - "Split tunneling allowing internet access during OT session" - "File transfer from jump server to OT without scanning" - "Persistent VPN connections (auto-reconnect disabled)" vendor_access_conduit: conduit_id: "VA-001" source_zone: "Vendor External Network" destination_zone: "OT DMZ (Level 3.5)" security_level_target: "SL3" workflow: request: - "Vendor submits access request via portal (24h advance)" - "Request includes: purpose, target systems, duration, personnel" - "Plant operations manager reviews and approves/rejects" - "Time-limited credentials generated upon approval" session: - "Vendor connects via dedicated vendor VPN gateway" - "MFA authentication (vendor receives OTP via SMS/app)" - "Session lands on vendor-specific jump server (isolated from internal jump)" - "All actions recorded (video + keystroke logging)" - "OT engineer monitors vendor session in real-time" termination: - "Session auto-terminates at approved end time" - "Credentials automatically revoked" - "Session recording archived for 90 days" - "Access log forwarded to SIEM"
python#!/usr/bin/env python3 """OT Remote Access Conduit Manager. Manages approval-based remote access to OT systems through secure conduit architecture with session recording, MFA enforcement, and time-limited access windows. """ import json import sys from datetime import datetime, timedelta from typing import Dict, List, Optional from enum import Enum class AccessRequestStatus(Enum): PENDING = "pending" APPROVED = "approved" REJECTED = "rejected" ACTIVE = "active" EXPIRED = "expired" REVOKED = "revoked" class RemoteAccessRequest: """Represents an OT remote access request.""" def __init__(self, requestor: str, requestor_type: str, purpose: str, target_systems: List[str], duration_hours: int, requested_start: str): self.id = f"OT-RA-{datetime.now().strftime('%Y%m%d-%H%M%S')}" self.requestor = requestor self.requestor_type = requestor_type # "internal_engineer" or "vendor" self.purpose = purpose self.target_systems = target_systems self.duration_hours = duration_hours self.requested_start = requested_start self.status = AccessRequestStatus.PENDING self.created = datetime.now().isoformat() self.approved_by = None self.session_id = None self.audit_trail = [] def approve(self, approver: str, conditions: str = ""): """Approve the access request.""" self.status = AccessRequestStatus.APPROVED self.approved_by = approver self.audit_trail.append({ "timestamp": datetime.now().isoformat(), "action": "APPROVED", "actor": approver, "conditions": conditions, }) def reject(self, rejector: str, reason: str): """Reject the access request.""" self.status = AccessRequestStatus.REJECTED self.audit_trail.append({ "timestamp": datetime.now().isoformat(), "action": "REJECTED", "actor": rejector, "reason": reason, }) class OTConduitManager: """Manages OT remote access conduit security.""" def __init__(self): self.access_requests: Dict[str, RemoteAccessRequest] = {} self.active_sessions: Dict[str, dict] = {} self.policy = self._load_policy() def _load_policy(self) -> dict: """Load remote access policy.""" return { "max_session_hours": 4, "idle_timeout_minutes": 15, "mfa_required": True, "session_recording": True, "clipboard_transfer": False, "file_transfer": "scan_required", "advance_notice_hours": 24, "vendor_escort_required": True, "prohibited_targets": ["SIS-*", "SAFETY-*"], "allowed_protocols": ["RDP", "SSH", "VNC"], "blocked_protocols": ["Telnet", "FTP", "SMB"], } def submit_request(self, request: RemoteAccessRequest) -> str: """Submit a new remote access request.""" # Validate against policy violations = [] if request.duration_hours > self.policy["max_session_hours"]: violations.append( f"Duration {request.duration_hours}h exceeds maximum {self.policy['max_session_hours']}h" ) for target in request.target_systems: for prohibited in self.policy["prohibited_targets"]: pattern = prohibited.replace("*", "") if target.startswith(pattern): violations.append(f"Target {target} is in prohibited list (safety systems)") if violations: print(f"[!] Policy violations found:") for v in violations: print(f" - {v}") return "" self.access_requests[request.id] = request print(f"[+] Access request {request.id} submitted for approval") return request.id def list_pending_requests(self): """List all pending access requests for approval.""" pending = [r for r in self.access_requests.values() if r.status == AccessRequestStatus.PENDING] print(f"\n{'='*65}") print("PENDING OT REMOTE ACCESS REQUESTS") print(f"{'='*65}") if not pending: print(" No pending requests") return for req in pending: print(f"\n Request: {req.id}") print(f" Requestor: {req.requestor} ({req.requestor_type})") print(f" Purpose: {req.purpose}") print(f" Targets: {', '.join(req.target_systems)}") print(f" Duration: {req.duration_hours} hours") print(f" Start: {req.requested_start}") print(f" Submitted: {req.created}") def generate_audit_report(self): """Generate audit report of all remote access activity.""" print(f"\n{'='*65}") print("OT REMOTE ACCESS AUDIT REPORT") print(f"{'='*65}") print(f"Report Date: {datetime.now().isoformat()}") print(f"Total Requests: {len(self.access_requests)}") status_counts = {} for req in self.access_requests.values(): status = req.status.value status_counts[status] = status_counts.get(status, 0) + 1 print(f"\nRequest Status:") for status, count in status_counts.items(): print(f" {status}: {count}") print(f"\nDetailed Audit Trail:") for req in self.access_requests.values(): print(f"\n {req.id} - {req.requestor} ({req.requestor_type})") print(f" Status: {req.status.value}") print(f" Targets: {', '.join(req.target_systems)}") for entry in req.audit_trail: print(f" [{entry['timestamp']}] {entry['action']} by {entry['actor']}") if __name__ == "__main__": manager = OTConduitManager() # Vendor access request vendor_req = RemoteAccessRequest( requestor="John Smith - Siemens Field Service", requestor_type="vendor", purpose="Annual PLC firmware update for S7-1500 controllers", target_systems=["PLC-REACTOR-01", "PLC-REACTOR-02"], duration_hours=3, requested_start="2025-03-15T08:00:00", ) req_id = manager.submit_request(vendor_req) if req_id: manager.list_pending_requests() # Simulate approval manager.access_requests[req_id].approve( approver="Plant Manager - Jane Doe", conditions="OT engineer must shadow the vendor session", ) manager.generate_audit_report()
| Term | Definition | |------|------------| | Conduit | IEC 62443 controlled communication path between security zones with defined security policies | | Jump Server | Hardened intermediary server in the DMZ through which all remote OT access must transit | | Session Recording | Capture of all screen activity, keystrokes, and commands during a remote access session for audit | | Approval-Based Access | Workflow requiring plant operations manager authorization before remote access credentials are activated | | Vendor Escort | Practice of having an internal OT engineer monitor vendor remote sessions in real time | | Break-Glass Access | Emergency access procedure bypassing normal approval workflow for critical situations |
OT REMOTE ACCESS CONDUIT REPORT
==================================
Date: YYYY-MM-DD
CONDUIT STATUS:
Internal Access Conduit: [Active/Inactive]
Vendor Access Conduit: [Active/Inactive]
ACCESS REQUESTS (Last 30 Days):
Submitted: [count]
Approved: [count]
Rejected: [count]
Average Session Duration: [hours]
POLICY COMPLIANCE:
MFA Enforcement: [100%]
Session Recording: [100%]
Time-Limited Sessions: [compliance %]
Prohibited Target Attempts: [count blocked]| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted, and 22 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +22 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 2 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.