Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Implements endpoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) controls to detect and prevent sensitive data exfiltration through email, USB, cloud storage, and printing. Use when deploying DLP agents, creating content inspection policies, or preventing unauthorized data movement from endpoints. Activates for requests involving DLP, data exfiltration prevention, content inspection, or sensitive data protection on endpoints.
.claude/skills/implementing-endpoint-dlp-controls/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Use this skill when:
Do not use for network DLP (inline proxy-based) or cloud-only DLP (CASB).
Microsoft Purview → Data Classification → Sensitive info types
Built-in SITs for common data:
- Credit card number (PCI)
- Social Security Number (PII)
- Health records (HIPAA)
- Passport number
- Bank account number
Custom SIT example (Employee ID):
Pattern: EMP-[0-9]{6}
Confidence: High
Keywords: "employee id", "emp id", "staff number"Microsoft Purview → Data loss prevention → Policies → Create policy
Policy Configuration:
1. Template: Financial / Medical / PII (or custom)
2. Locations: Devices (endpoint DLP)
3. Conditions:
- Content contains: Credit card numbers (min 5 instances)
- OR Content contains: SSN (min 1 instance)
4. Actions:
- Block: Prevent copy to USB, cloud, email
- Audit: Log but allow (for initial deployment)
- Notify: Show user notification with policy tip
5. User notifications:
- "This file contains sensitive data and cannot be copied to this location"
- Allow override with business justification (optional)Monitored endpoint activities:
- Upload to cloud service (OneDrive, Dropbox, Google Drive)
- Copy to removable media (USB drives)
- Copy to network share
- Print document
- Copy to clipboard
- Access by unallowed browser (non-managed browser)
- Access by unallowed app
- Copy to Remote Desktop session
For each activity, configure:
- Audit only (log the action)
- Block with override (user can justify and proceed)
- Block (prevent action entirely)Deploy DLP policy in "Test mode with notifications" first:
1. Policy runs in audit mode for 2-4 weeks
2. Review DLP alerts in Activity Explorer
3. Identify false positives
4. Tune SIT patterns and conditions
5. Add exclusions for legitimate workflows
6. Switch to "Turn on the policy" (enforcement)Purview → Data loss prevention → Activity explorer
Key metrics:
- DLP policy matches per day/week
- Top matched sensitive info types
- Top users triggering DLP
- Top activities blocked (USB, cloud, email)
- Override rate (percentage of blocks overridden)
DLP incident response:
1. Review DLP alert with matched content
2. Verify sensitivity of detected data
3. Assess intent (accidental vs. intentional)
4. If intentional exfiltration → escalate to security incident
5. If accidental → educate user, refine policy| Term | Definition | |------|-----------| | DLP | Data Loss Prevention; technology that detects and prevents unauthorized transmission of sensitive data | | SIT | Sensitive Information Type; pattern matching rules for identifying sensitive data (regex, keywords, ML classifiers) | | Policy Tip | User-facing notification explaining why an action was blocked and how to request an override | | Content Inspection | Deep inspection of file contents to identify sensitive data patterns | | Exact Data Match (EDM) | DLP matching against a specific database of known sensitive values (exact SSNs, employee records) |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-20 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +27 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.