Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Integrate gitleaks and trufflehog into CI/CD pipelines to detect leaked secrets before deployment
.claude/skills/implementing-secrets-scanning-in-ci-cd/SKILL.md| Model | Eval pass | Runs |
|---|---|---|
| gemini-3.6-flash | 100% | 6 |
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-21 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-14 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-22 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
This skill covers implementing automated secrets scanning in CI/CD pipelines using gitleaks and trufflehog. It enables security teams to detect API keys, tokens, passwords, and other credentials that have been accidentally committed to source code repositories, providing a CI gate that blocks deployments containing high-severity findings.
Gitleaks scans git repositories and directories for hardcoded secrets using regex patterns and entropy analysis. TruffleHog performs filesystem and git history scans with optional secret verification against live services. Together they provide comprehensive coverage for secrets detection.
brew install trufflehog or download from GitHub releases..gitleaks.toml configuration file in the repository root to define custom rules, allowlists, and path exclusions. Use --config flag to point to custom configs.gitleaks dir --source . --report-format json --report-path gitleaks-report.json to scan the working directory and generate a JSON report.trufflehog filesystem /path/to/repo --json > trufflehog-report.json to scan files and output JSON findings to a report file.--exit-code flag in gitleaks to control pipeline behavior.gitleaks protect --staged to catch secrets before they are committed..gitleaksignore, and rotate any confirmed leaked credentials immediately.The agent script produces a JSON report containing:
json{ "scan_summary": { "tool": "both", "total_findings": 3, "critical": 1, "high": 1, "medium": 1, "low": 0, "ci_gate": "FAIL", "fail_reason": "Found 1 critical and 1 high severity findings" }, "findings": [...] }
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 19 counted toward the lift figure. The other 3 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +9 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 19 comparable cases. 2 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.