Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Implements an integrated incident ticketing system connecting SIEM alerts to ServiceNow, Jira, or TheHive for structured incident tracking, SLA management, escalation workflows, and compliance documentation. Use when SOC teams need formalized incident lifecycle management with automated ticket creation, assignment routing, and resolution tracking.
.claude/skills/implementing-ticketing-system-for-incidents/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Use this skill when:
Do not use for individual alert triage — ticketing is for confirmed incidents requiring multi-step investigation and remediation, not every SIEM alert.
Establish standardized incident categories and severity:
yamlincident_taxonomy: categories: - malware_infection - phishing_campaign - unauthorized_access - data_exfiltration - denial_of_service - ransomware - insider_threat - vulnerability_exploitation - account_compromise - policy_violation severity_levels: critical: definition: "Active data breach, ransomware, or business-critical system compromise" response_sla: 15 minutes resolution_sla: 4 hours escalation: immediate to Tier 3 + CISO notification examples: ["Active ransomware", "Domain admin compromise", "Customer data breach"] high: definition: "Confirmed compromise of business systems or multiple user accounts" response_sla: 30 minutes resolution_sla: 8 hours escalation: Tier 2 immediate, Tier 3 if unresolved in 2 hours examples: ["Malware with C2", "Lateral movement detected", "Phishing with credential theft"] medium: definition: "Confirmed security event requiring investigation and remediation" response_sla: 2 hours resolution_sla: 24 hours escalation: Tier 2 within 4 hours examples: ["Single phishing click", "Unauthorized software", "Policy violation"] low: definition: "Minor security event with limited impact" response_sla: 8 hours resolution_sla: 72 hours escalation: Tier 1 standard queue examples: ["Scan attempt", "Failed brute force (no compromise)", "Info disclosure"]
ServiceNow Integration via REST API:
pythonimport requests import json from datetime import datetime class IncidentTicketManager: def __init__(self, snow_url, snow_user, snow_password): self.snow_url = snow_url self.auth = (snow_user, snow_password) self.headers = { "Content-Type": "application/json", "Accept": "application/json" } def create_incident(self, alert_data): """Create ServiceNow incident from SIEM alert""" severity_map = { "critical": "1", "high": "2", "medium": "3", "low": "4" } payload = { "short_description": f"[SEC] {alert_data['rule_name']} — {alert_data['src']}", "description": self._build_description(alert_data), "category": "Security", "subcategory": alert_data.get("category", "Investigation"), "urgency": severity_map.get(alert_data["severity"], "3"), "impact": severity_map.get(alert_data["severity"], "3"), "assignment_group": self._get_assignment_group(alert_data["severity"]), "caller_id": "soc_automation", "u_siem_event_id": alert_data.get("notable_id", ""), "u_mitre_technique": alert_data.get("mitre_technique", ""), "u_affected_hosts": ", ".join(alert_data.get("affected_hosts", [])), "u_iocs": json.dumps(alert_data.get("iocs", {})) } response = requests.post( f"{self.snow_url}/api/now/table/incident", auth=self.auth, headers=self.headers, json=payload ) result = response.json()["result"] return { "ticket_number": result["number"], "sys_id": result["sys_id"], "state": result["state"] } def _build_description(self, alert_data): return f""" SECURITY INCIDENT — Auto-generated from SIEM ================================================ Alert Rule: {alert_data['rule_name']} SIEM Event ID: {alert_data.get('notable_id', 'N/A')} Detection Time: {alert_data['detection_time']} Severity: {alert_data['severity'].upper()} MITRE ATT&CK: {alert_data.get('mitre_technique', 'N/A')} Source: {alert_data.get('src', 'N/A')} Destination: {alert_data.get('dest', 'N/A')} User: {alert_data.get('user', 'N/A')} Initial Context: {alert_data.get('description', 'See SIEM for details.')} IOCs: {json.dumps(alert_data.get('iocs', {}), indent=2)} """ def _get_assignment_group(self, severity): if severity in ("critical", "high"): return "SOC Tier 2" return "SOC Tier 1" def update_incident(self, ticket_number, updates): """Update an existing incident""" # First get sys_id from ticket number response = requests.get( f"{self.snow_url}/api/now/table/incident", auth=self.auth, headers=self.headers, params={"sysparm_query": f"number={ticket_number}", "sysparm_limit": 1} ) sys_id = response.json()["result"][0]["sys_id"] # Update response = requests.patch( f"{self.snow_url}/api/now/table/incident/{sys_id}", auth=self.auth, headers=self.headers, json=updates ) return response.json()["result"] def add_work_note(self, ticket_number, note): """Add investigation note to incident""" self.update_incident(ticket_number, {"work_notes": note}) def escalate_incident(self, ticket_number, reason): """Escalate to next tier""" self.update_incident(ticket_number, { "assignment_group": "SOC Tier 3", "urgency": "1", "work_notes": f"ESCALATED: {reason}" }) def resolve_incident(self, ticket_number, resolution): """Resolve and close incident""" self.update_incident(ticket_number, { "state": "6", # Resolved "close_code": "Resolved", "close_notes": resolution, "u_incident_disposition": resolution.split(":")[0] if ":" in resolution else "Resolved" })
TheHive Case Creation (alternative to ServiceNow):
pythonimport requests class TheHiveCaseManager: def __init__(self, thehive_url, api_key): self.url = thehive_url self.headers = { "Authorization": f"Bearer {api_key}", "Content-Type": "application/json" } def create_case(self, alert_data): """Create case in TheHive from SIEM alert""" case = { "title": f"[{alert_data['severity'].upper()}] {alert_data['rule_name']}", "description": self._build_markdown_description(alert_data), "severity": {"critical": 4, "high": 3, "medium": 2, "low": 1}.get( alert_data["severity"], 2 ), "tlp": 2, # TLP:AMBER "pap": 2, # PAP:AMBER "tags": [ alert_data.get("mitre_technique", ""), alert_data.get("category", ""), f"source:{alert_data.get('src', 'unknown')}" ], "tasks": self._generate_tasks(alert_data["severity"]), "customFields": { "siem-event-id": {"string": alert_data.get("notable_id", "")}, "mitre-technique": {"string": alert_data.get("mitre_technique", "")}, "detection-source": {"string": "Splunk ES"} } } response = requests.post( f"{self.url}/api/case", headers=self.headers, json=case ) return response.json() def _generate_tasks(self, severity): """Generate investigation tasks based on severity""" tasks = [ {"title": "Initial Triage", "group": "Phase 1", "description": "Review SIEM alert and validate findings"}, {"title": "IOC Enrichment", "group": "Phase 1", "description": "Enrich all IOCs with VT, AbuseIPDB"}, {"title": "Scope Assessment", "group": "Phase 2", "description": "Determine affected systems and users"}, ] if severity in ("critical", "high"): tasks.extend([ {"title": "Containment Actions", "group": "Phase 2", "description": "Isolate affected systems"}, {"title": "Evidence Collection", "group": "Phase 3", "description": "Preserve forensic artifacts"}, {"title": "Eradication", "group": "Phase 3", "description": "Remove threat from environment"}, {"title": "Recovery", "group": "Phase 4", "description": "Restore systems to normal operations"}, {"title": "Post-Incident Review", "group": "Phase 4", "description": "Document lessons learned"}, ]) else: tasks.append( {"title": "Resolution and Documentation", "group": "Phase 2", "description": "Document findings and close"} ) return tasks def add_observable(self, case_id, ioc_type, ioc_value, description=""): """Add IOC observable to case""" observable = { "dataType": ioc_type, "data": ioc_value, "message": description, "tlp": 2, "ioc": True, "tags": ["auto-extracted"] } response = requests.post( f"{self.url}/api/case/{case_id}/artifact", headers=self.headers, json=observable ) return response.json()
Splunk SLA Monitoring Dashboard:
spl--- Active incidents approaching SLA breach index=servicenow sourcetype="snow:incident" category="Security" state IN ("New", "In Progress") | eval sla_minutes = case( urgency="1", 15, urgency="2", 30, urgency="3", 120, urgency="4", 480 ) | eval age_minutes = round((now() - strptime(opened_at, "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S")) / 60, 0) | eval sla_remaining = sla_minutes - age_minutes | eval sla_status = case( sla_remaining < 0, "BREACHED", sla_remaining < sla_minutes * 0.25, "AT RISK", 1=1, "ON TRACK" ) | where sla_status IN ("BREACHED", "AT RISK") | sort sla_remaining | table number, short_description, urgency, assignment_group, assigned_to, age_minutes, sla_minutes, sla_remaining, sla_status
Auto-Escalation Logic:
pythondef check_sla_breaches(ticket_manager): """Check for SLA breaches and auto-escalate""" open_incidents = ticket_manager.get_open_incidents() for incident in open_incidents: age_minutes = (datetime.utcnow() - incident["opened_at"]).total_seconds() / 60 sla_minutes = {"1": 15, "2": 30, "3": 120, "4": 480}[incident["urgency"]] if age_minutes > sla_minutes and incident["state"] == "New": ticket_manager.escalate_incident( incident["number"], f"SLA BREACH: {int(age_minutes)}min elapsed, {sla_minutes}min SLA. Auto-escalating." )
spl--- Monthly incident metrics index=servicenow sourcetype="snow:incident" category="Security" opened_at > "2024-03-01" opened_at < "2024-04-01" | stats count AS total, avg(eval((resolved_at - opened_at) / 3600)) AS avg_resolution_hours, sum(eval(if(urgency="1", 1, 0))) AS critical, sum(eval(if(urgency="2", 1, 0))) AS high, sum(eval(if(urgency="3", 1, 0))) AS medium, sum(eval(if(urgency="4", 1, 0))) AS low | eval avg_resolution = round(avg_resolution_hours, 1) --- SLA compliance rate index=servicenow sourcetype="snow:incident" category="Security" state="Resolved" | eval sla_target = case(urgency="1", 4, urgency="2", 8, urgency="3", 24, urgency="4", 72) | eval resolution_hours = (resolved_at - opened_at) / 3600 | eval sla_met = if(resolution_hours <= sla_target, 1, 0) | stats sum(sla_met) AS met, count AS total | eval compliance_pct = round(met / total * 100, 1)
| Term | Definition | |------|-----------| | Incident Ticket | Formal tracking record for a confirmed security incident with lifecycle management | | SLA | Service Level Agreement defining maximum response and resolution times by severity | | Escalation Path | Defined routing from Tier 1 to Tier 2/3 based on severity, time elapsed, or analyst request | | Disposition | Final classification of a closed incident (true positive, false positive, duplicate, policy violation) | | MTTR | Mean Time to Resolve — average time from ticket creation to resolution across all incidents | | Case Management | Structured approach to managing complex incidents with tasks, observables, and audit trails |
INCIDENT TICKET — INC0012567
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Title: [SEC] Cobalt Strike C2 Beacon Detected — WORKSTATION-042
Category: Security > Malware Infection
Severity: Critical (P1)
SLA: Response: 15 min | Resolution: 4 hours
Timeline:
14:23 Ticket created (auto from Splunk ES NE-2024-08921)
14:25 Assigned to analyst_jdoe (Tier 2)
14:28 Work note: "VT confirms Cobalt Strike beacon, hash a1b2c3..."
14:35 Work note: "Host isolated via CrowdStrike, C2 domain blocked"
15:00 Work note: "Enterprise IOC scan — 2 additional hosts found"
15:30 Escalated to Tier 3 for forensic analysis
16:00 Work note: "All affected hosts contained and cleaned"
18:00 Resolved: "Malware eradicated, systems restored, monitoring for 72h"
Metrics:
Time to Acknowledge: 2 minutes
Time to Contain: 12 minutes
Time to Resolve: 3 hours 37 minutes
SLA Status: MET (within 4-hour resolution target)| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +41 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.