Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Methodology for exploratory data analysis on scientific files. Decision frameworks by data type (tabular, sequence, image, spectral, structural, omics), quality assessment, report generation, format detection across 200+ formats. Use when given a data file for initial exploration or to pick an analysis before a pipeline.
.claude/skills/jaechang-hits-exploratory-data-analysis/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 230% | 0% |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 140% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | 94% | 0% |
| case-18 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | 190% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 67% | 0% |
Exploratory data analysis (EDA) is the systematic examination of scientific data files to understand their structure, content, quality, and characteristics before formal analysis. This knowhow covers methodology for detecting file types, selecting appropriate analysis approaches, assessing data quality, and generating comprehensive reports across all major scientific data domains.
| Category | Common Formats | Typical Analysis | Key Libraries | |----------|---------------|-----------------|---------------| | Tabular | CSV, TSV, XLSX, Parquet | Summary statistics, distributions, correlations, missing values | pandas, polars | | Sequence | FASTA, FASTQ, SAM/BAM | Length distribution, quality scores, GC content, alignment stats | BioPython, pysam | | Image/Microscopy | TIFF, ND2, CZI, DICOM | Dimensions (XYZCT), intensity stats, metadata, calibration | tifffile, aicsimageio, nd2reader | | Spectral | mzML, SPC, JCAMP, FID | Peak detection, baseline, S/N ratio, resolution | pymzml, nmrglue, pyteomics | | Structural | PDB, CIF, MOL, SDF | Atom counts, bond validation, B-factors, completeness | BioPython, RDKit, MDAnalysis | | Array/Tensor | NPY, HDF5, Zarr, NetCDF | Shape, dtype, value range, NaN/Inf check, chunk structure | numpy, h5py, zarr, xarray | | Omics | H5AD, MTX, VCF, BED | Feature/sample counts, sparsity, annotation completeness | scanpy, pyranges, cyvcf2 |
\x89HDF, GZIP: \x1f\x8b).ome.tiff, .nii.gz, .tar.gz by checking from the rightmost extension inwardData file received
├── What is the file type?
│ ├── Known extension → Look up in format reference
│ ├── Unknown extension → Magic bytes / content sniffing
│ └── Directory (e.g., .d, .zarr) → Check internal structure
│
├── What category does it belong to?
│ ├── Tabular → Summary stats, distributions, correlations
│ ├── Sequence → Length/quality distributions, composition
│ ├── Image → Dimensions, channels, intensity, metadata
│ ├── Spectral → Peaks, baseline, resolution, S/N
│ ├── Structural → Atom/bond validation, geometry checks
│ ├── Array → Shape, dtype, value range, sparsity
│ └── Omics → Feature counts, sample QC, annotation check
│
├── How large is the file?
│ ├── Small (<100 MB) → Load fully, comprehensive analysis
│ ├── Medium (100 MB–1 GB) → Sample or lazy evaluation
│ └── Large (>1 GB) → Stream/chunk, representative sampling
│
└── What is the analysis goal?
├── Pre-pipeline QC → Focus on completeness, format compliance
├── Data understanding → Statistics, distributions, patterns
├── Troubleshooting → Compare against expected format/values
└── Documentation → Full report with recommendations| Data Type | First Check | Core Analysis | Visualization | |-----------|------------|---------------|---------------| | Tabular | dtypes, shape, nulls | describe(), correlations, outliers | histograms, scatter, heatmap | | Sequence | record count, format | length dist., quality, composition | quality plots, length histogram | | Image | dimensions, bit depth | intensity stats, channel info | thumbnail, histogram | | Spectral | scan count, m/z range | peak detection, TIC, baseline | spectrum plot, TIC chromatogram | | Structural | atom/residue count | B-factors, missing residues | Ramachandran, contact map | | Array | shape, dtype | statistics, NaN check | slice visualization | | Omics | genes × cells matrix | sparsity, QC metrics | violin plots, PCA |
pl.scan_parquet(), h5py dataset slicing, pysam indexed access prevent memory overflowspd.read_csv(engine='python') for robustness; check encoding with chardetNA, NaN, -999, empty string, #N/A, .. How to avoid: Specify na_values parameter; check for sentinel values in numeric columns.ome.tiff, .nii.gz)pip install command)Generate a structured markdown report containing:
Save as {original_filename}_eda_report.md.
references/file_format_reference.md — Quick-reference catalog of the most common scientific file formats across all 6 categories (bioinformatics, chemistry, microscopy, spectroscopy, proteomics/metabolomics, general), with extension, description, Python library, and key EDA approach for each formatNot migrated from original: The 6 category-specific format catalog files (3,616 lines total) contained detailed entries for 200+ formats. The bundled reference consolidates the ~50 most commonly encountered formats. For rare or vendor-specific formats, consult official library documentation.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-11 | pass→pass | 18,034 | 13,023 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,957 | 4,933 | +67% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 6,637 | 44,448 | +570% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 222 | 3,181 | +1333% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 32,991 | 5,218 | -84% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,220 | 3,042 | -51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | 14,753 | 6,482 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,554 | 3,886 | +52% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 20,550 | 14,293 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,476 | 5,237 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 28,000 | 8,592 | -69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,608 | 4,109 | +156% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 12,711 | 11,312 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,096 | 4,792 | +129% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 14,525 | 13,870 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,189 | 5,092 | +133% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 7,062 | 7,935 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,122 | 4,110 | +266% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→fail | 15,760 | 12,654 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,441 | 4,735 | +94% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 17,352 | 33,929 | +96% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,904 | 5,762 | +98% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 5,558 | 1,856 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 922 | 3,047 | +230% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 12,071 | 27,073 | +124% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,984 | 3,915 | +97% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 15,973 | 16,728 | +5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,621 | 5,614 | +114% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 10,626 | 6,383 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,649 | 3,881 | +135% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 13,091 | 15,144 | +16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,218 | 5,318 | +140% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 12,004 | 8,932 | -26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,237 | 4,370 | +95% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→fail | 7,065 | 3,223 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,118 | 3,240 | +190% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 12,781 | 13,883 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,232 | 5,120 | +129% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | 21,230 | 20,064 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 313 | 7,123 | +2176% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | 14,316 | 4,759 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,295 | 2,976 | -10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | 31,890 | 30,823 | -3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,876 | 8,926 | +52% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 18 counted toward the lift figure. The other 4 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of 0 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 18 comparable cases. 3 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.