Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Scientific presentations for conferences, seminars, thesis defenses, and grant pitches. Slide design, talk structure, timing, data viz for slides, QA. PowerPoint and LaTeX Beamer. For posters use latex-research-posters.
.claude/skills/jaechang-hits-scientific-slides/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 94% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 126% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 187% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 91% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 147% | 0% |
Scientific presentations are a critical medium for communicating research at conferences, seminars, defenses, and professional talks. This knowhow covers end-to-end presentation development: structure and content planning, visual design principles, data visualization adaptation, timing and pacing, and quality assurance across PowerPoint and LaTeX Beamer formats.
| Talk Type | Duration | Slides | Focus | Key Finding Count | |-----------|----------|--------|-------|-------------------| | Conference talk | 10–20 min | 12–20 | 1–2 key findings | 1–2 | | Academic seminar | 45–60 min | 40–60 | Comprehensive coverage | 3–6 | | Thesis defense | 45–60 min | 45–65 | Full dissertation | All studies | | Grant pitch | 10–20 min | 12–18 | Significance + feasibility | Preliminary data | | Journal club | 20–45 min | 20–40 | Critical analysis | Paper's findings |
Visual-first approach: Start with visuals (figures, diagrams, images), then add text as support. Target 60–70% visual content, 30–40% text. Every slide should have a strong visual element.
Typography:
Color:
Layout:
Key differences from journal figures:
| Chart Type | Best For | Slide Adaptation | |-----------|----------|-----------------| | Bar chart | Category comparison | Max 6–8 bars, large labels | | Line graph | Trends over time | Bold lines, 2–3 series max | | Scatter plot | Correlations | Large points, trend line | | Heatmap | Matrix patterns | High contrast, annotate key cells | | Flowchart | Methodology | Build step-by-step with animations |
Every scientific talk follows this narrative structure:
Start: What is your priority?
├── Mathematical content, equations, version control?
│ └── YES → LaTeX Beamer (see assets/beamer templates)
├── Editable slides, company templates, animations?
│ └── YES → PowerPoint (programmatic or template-based)
├── Fast creation, non-technical audience, visual impact?
│ └── YES → PowerPoint or image-based PDF
└── Not sure
└── PowerPoint (most flexible default)| Duration | Simple Topic | Average | Complex Topic | |----------|-------------|---------|---------------| | 5 min | 5–6 | 6–8 | 5–7 | | 10 min | 10–12 | 12–14 | 10–12 | | 15 min | 14–16 | 16–18 | 14–16 | | 30 min | 25–30 | 30–35 | 25–30 | | 45 min | 38–45 | 45–50 | 38–45 | | 60 min | 50–55 | 55–65 | 50–60 |
General rule: ~1 slide per minute. Complex slides (results, methodology) may take 2–3 minutes; simple slides (transitions, section dividers) take 15–30 seconds.
| Section | % of Time | 15-min Talk | 45-min Talk | |---------|-----------|------------|------------| | Introduction | 15–20% | 2–3 min | 7–9 min | | Methods | 15–20% | 2–3 min | 7–9 min | | Results | 40–50% | 6–7 min | 18–22 min | | Discussion | 15–20% | 2–3 min | 7–9 min | | Conclusion | 5% | 45 sec | 2 min |
bash# Basic compilation pdflatex presentation.tex # With bibliography pdflatex presentation.tex && bibtex presentation && pdflatex presentation.tex && pdflatex presentation.tex # Better font support lualatex presentation.tex
Detailed reference files in references/:
| File | Content | |------|---------| | talk_types_guide.md | Detailed structure and strategy for each talk type (conference, seminar, defense, grant pitch, journal club) with example outlines | | slide_design_guide.md | Extended design principles: color theory, typography tables, layout patterns, accessibility guidelines, Gestalt principles for visual composition |
Templates and guides in assets/:
| File | Description | |------|-------------| | beamer_template_conference.tex | LaTeX Beamer template for 15-minute conference talks | | beamer_template_seminar.tex | LaTeX Beamer template for 45-minute academic seminars | | beamer_template_defense.tex | LaTeX Beamer template for thesis/dissertation defenses | | timing_guidelines.md | Comprehensive timing and pacing strategies for all talk types |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-05 | fail→fail | 12,387 | 10,368 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,783 | 5,022 | +182% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | 22,417 | 35,874 | +60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,499 | 6,786 | +94% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 20,620 | 23,127 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,033 | 6,845 | +126% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 11,326 | 10,745 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,785 | 5,124 | +187% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 15,170 | 8,394 | -45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,502 | 4,789 | +91% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 11,786 | 7,029 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,858 | 4,597 | +147% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 12,223 | 6,932 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,007 | 4,558 | +127% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 11,644 | 13,663 | +17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,688 | 5,453 | +223% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 15,504 | 6,818 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,629 | 4,500 | +176% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 11,827 | 8,104 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,744 | 4,717 | +170% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 11,272 | 17,624 | +56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,705 | 4,727 | +177% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 22,238 | 10,303 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,188 | 5,048 | +131% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 12,338 | 9,417 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,936 | 4,938 | +155% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 11,055 | 5,803 | -48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,733 | 4,274 | +147% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 16,072 | 7,520 | -53% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,434 | 4,614 | +90% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | 11,843 | 8,224 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,062 | 4,780 | +132% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 19,946 | 4,821 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,874 | 4,193 | +46% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 6,950 | 3,622 | -48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,242 | 4,076 | +228% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 9,767 | 26,565 | +172% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,527 | 3,863 | +153% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 13,804 | 12,420 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,393 | 5,481 | +129% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 13,131 | 13,371 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,198 | 5,727 | +161% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 20,039 | 21,909 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,020 | 6,662 | +121% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +55 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.