Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Diagnose and fix Exa API errors by HTTP code and error tag. Use when encountering Exa errors, debugging failed requests, or troubleshooting integration issues. Trigger with phrases like "exa error", "fix exa", "exa not working", "debug exa", "exa 429", "exa 401".
.claude/skills/jeremylongshore-exa-common-errors/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 36% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 21% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 64% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 4% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 19% | 0% |
Classify Exa failures by HTTP status, error tag, endpoint, and per-item crawl status before deciding whether to repair, retry, or escalate. Treat credentials, queries, retrieved content, generated output, spend, and destructive state as separately governed boundaries.
Documented errors distinguish invalid requests, authentication, exhausted credits or budgets, access policy, per-URL crawl failure, rate limiting, service overload, and Answer generation failure. Most errors include requestId, error, and tag; 429 can use a simpler body. Contents also reports granular statuses inside a successful response.
For normal REST work, inject EXA_API_KEY from an approved server-side secret manager and send it only as Authorization: Bearer to the configured first-party Exa API host. Team Management service keys, hosted MCP OAuth or enterprise managed authorization, and payment-protocol calls are separate trust models. Never print, commit, place in a URL, or expose a credential to an untrusted client.
Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect repository code, configuration, fixtures, and evidence. Use Write and Edit only for approved implementation or documentation changes. Do not call Exa, run paid research, create or alter a Monitor, Webset, Agent run, Batch, team, member, API key, budget, webhook, or deployment merely because this skill was invoked.
Require an accountable owner before live queries involving sensitive intent, production credentials, spend or rate-limit changes, forced live crawling, generated summaries, external delivery, deployment, member or key changes, schedule creation, or destructive cancellation, stopping, deletion, or revocation. Read-only repository inspection and synthetic offline validation do not authorize live vendor actions.
Return the operation scope, environment, team and product surface, authorization class, contract and policy decisions, deterministic validation results, content-free identifiers, status and cost counts, risks, cleanup or rollback state, and a concise pass or fail receipt. Exclude credentials, raw queries, prompts, presigned URLs, retrieved content, generated output, and customer-derived data unless separately approved.
Rerun the smallest relevant deterministic test, compare actual behavior with the requested outcome and current first-party contract, verify sensitive fields are absent from evidence, and confirm deadlines, terminal state, downstream retention, and rollback before reporting success.
Review the dated first-party evidence map before relying on any endpoint, parameter, search type, price, limit, beta, compliance, identity, retry, or lifecycle claim.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 17,145 | 17,095 | -0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,112 | 4,236 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 19,270 | 11,652 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,917 | 3,516 | +21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 10,508 | 10,073 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,179 | 3,571 | +64% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 15,508 | 4,700 | -70% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,265 | 2,346 | +4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 12,675 | 4,081 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,712 | 2,036 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 10,451 | 2,828 | -73% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,393 | 1,826 | +31% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 5,755 | 3,541 | -38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 819 | 2,191 | +168% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 12,139 | 2,946 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,839 | 1,919 | +4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 12,400 | 2,551 | -79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,820 | 1,960 | +8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 24,108 | 5,713 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,508 | 2,370 | -32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 22,422 | 15,492 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,675 | 4,593 | +25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 12,866 | 2,055 | -84% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,308 | 1,857 | -20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 9,370 | 2,206 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,459 | 1,750 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 22,483 | 11,435 | -49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,815 | 3,276 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 12,262 | 5,634 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,797 | 2,577 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 9,794 | 6,661 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,462 | 2,476 | +69% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 10,160 | 2,850 | -72% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,820 | 1,808 | -1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 4,495 | 2,892 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 695 | 1,828 | +163% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 13,386 | 5,404 | -60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,268 | 2,470 | +9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 13,034 | 1,920 | -85% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,914 | 1,805 | -6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 10,321 | 6,149 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,725 | 2,345 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 5,203 | 2,080 | -60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 826 | 1,737 | +110% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | fail→pass | 9,612 | 10,630 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,681 | 3,214 | +91% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-24 | pass→pass | 10,208 | 11,318 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,925 | 3,272 | +70% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-25 | pass→pass | 9,561 | 5,791 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,911 | 2,709 | +42% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 25 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +68 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 25 comparable cases.
The publisher has shipped newer versions since this run, so these numbers describe v1, not the version currently listed.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.