Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →jeremylongshore/grammarly-cost-tuning
Optimize Grammarly costs through tier selection, sampling, and usage monitoring.
Passed 18 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 9 of 22 without it.
and 10 more in the full report
9 fixed9 passed either way4 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 9 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
We need to run a quality audit across 50,000 archived support knowledge base articles using Grammarly API. Running 100% of the documents will exhaust our annual budget in one day. What default sampling rate should be used for bulk content quality audits?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Bulk content audits should use a 20 percent (0.2) sampling rate. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Grammarly enterprise pricing is per-seat with API costs driven by text check request volume and document length. Each grammar check, tone analysis, and plagiarism scan consumes API quota proportional to word count. For organizations processing thousands of documents daily, unchecked API usage — especially on long documents or duplicate content — creates substantial cost overrun. Implementing validation gates, result caching, and sample-based scoring reduces API spend by 40-60% without sacrificing quality coverage.
| Component | Cost Driver | Optimization |
|---|---|---|
| Seat licenses | Per-user/month enterprise pricing | Audit active seats quarterly; remove inactive users |
| Text check requests | Per-call API quota on grammar/tone checks | Cache results for identical text; deduplicate requests |
| Document length | API cost scales with word count per request | Chunk documents over 10K words; skip boilerplate sections |
| Plagiarism scans | Higher-cost endpoint for originality checks | Run only on final drafts, not every revision |
| AI rewrite suggestions | Premium feature with per-request cost | Batch rewrites; limit to flagged passages only |
class GrammarlyCostGate {
private resultCache = new Map<string, any>();
shouldCheck(text: string): boolean {
const words = text.split(/\s+/).length;
return words >= 30 && words <= 50_000; // Skip too-short; chunk too-long
}
async checkWithCache(text: string, checkFn: (t: string) => Promise<any>): Promise<any> {
const hash = this.hashText(text);
if (this.resultCache.has(hash)) return this.resultCache.get(hash);
const result = await checkFn(text);
this.resultCache.set(hash, result);
return result;
}
sampleDocuments(documents: string[], rate = 0.2): string[] {
// For bulk content audits, score a representative sample
return documents.filter(() => Math.random() < rate);
}
test cases passed, vs 9 / 22 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.