Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →jeremylongshore/juicebox-core-workflow-b
Execute Juicebox enrichment and outreach workflow. Trigger: "juicebox enrich", "candidate enrichment", "talent pool".
Passed 22 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 7 of 22 without it.
and 23 more in the full report
16 fixed7 passed either way0 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 15 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
When retrieving Juicebox candidates via client.analysis.query, I want the best fit candidates first based on relevance score. What structure is required for the sort parameter?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Sets sort field to relevance_score. | Missed | Passed |
| Sets sort order to desc. | Passed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Build custom queries, apply multi-dimensional filters, and run cross-dataset analysis
on your Juicebox people-intelligence data. Use this workflow when you need to go beyond
standard search — comparing candidate pools across roles, analyzing skill density by
geography, or identifying talent trends over time. This is the secondary workflow;
for basic search and enrichment, see juicebox-core-workflow-a.
const query = await client.analysis.query({
dataset: 'candidates',
filters: [
{ field: 'skills', operator: 'contains_any', value: ['TypeScript', 'Rust', 'Go'] },
{ field: 'experience_years', operator: 'gte', value: 5 },
{ field: 'location.country', operator: 'eq', value: 'US' },
],
sort: { field: 'relevance_score', order: 'desc' },
limit: 100,
});
console.log(`Found ${query.total} candidates matching filters`);
query.results.forEach(c =>
console.log(` ${c.name} — ${c.title} (${c.relevance_score}/100)`)
);
const comparison = await client.analysis.compare({
datasets: ['candidates_q1_2026', 'candidates_q4_2025'],
group_by: 'primary_skill',
metrics: ['count', 'avg_experience', 'avg_salary_estimate'],
});
comparison.groups.forEach(g =>
test cases passed, vs 7 / 22 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.