Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Migrate between Kling AI model versions safely. Use when upgrading from v1.x to v2.x or adopting new features. Trigger with phrases like 'klingai upgrade', 'kling ai migrate', 'klingai version update', 'upgrade kling model'.
.claude/skills/jeremylongshore-klingai-upgrade-migration/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 58% | 0% |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 26% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -42% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 44% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -35% | 0% |
Guide for migrating between Kling AI model versions. Covers breaking changes, parameter differences, feature availability, and parallel testing strategies.
| Version | Release | Key Changes | |---------|---------|-------------| | v1.0 | 2024-06 | Initial T2V + I2V | | v1.5 | 2024-09 | 1080p, motion brush, I2V-only model | | v1.6 | 2024-11 | Lip sync, camera paths, effects API | | v2.0 | 2025-03 | Quality leap, kling-v2-master | | v2.1 | 2025-06 | Optimized I2V, kling-v2-1-master for T2V | | v2.5 Turbo | 2025-09 | 40% faster, best speed/quality ratio | | v2.6 | 2025-12 | Native audio, 30-48 FPS, highest quality |
python# v1.x request body = { "model_name": "kling-v1-6", "prompt": "A sunset over mountains", "duration": "5", "mode": "standard", } # v2.x -- only model_name changes body["model_name"] = "kling-v2-master"
Breaking changes:
kling-v2-1 is I2V-only (no text-to-video support)pythonbody["model_name"] = "kling-v2-6" body["motion_has_audio"] = True # NEW: synchronized audio # Cost impact: audio multiplies credits 5x # 5s standard: 10 -> 50 credits
| Feature | v1.0 | v1.5 | v1.6 | v2.0 | v2.1 | v2.5T | v2.6 | |---------|------|------|------|------|------|-------|------| | Text-to-video | Y | Y | Y | Y | I2V only | Y | Y | | Image-to-video | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | | Camera control | - | - | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | | Motion brush | - | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | | Lip sync | - | - | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | | Effects | - | - | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | | Native audio | - | - | - | - | - | - | Y | | 1080p | - | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
pythondef compare_models(prompt, models): """Generate same prompt across models for comparison.""" results = {} for model in models: r = requests.post(f"{BASE}/videos/text2video", headers=get_headers(), json={ "model_name": model, "prompt": prompt, "duration": "5", "mode": "standard", }).json() results[model] = {"task_id": r["data"]["task_id"], "start": time.time()} # Poll all while any("url" not in r for r in results.values()): for model, info in results.items(): if "url" in info or "error" in info: continue r = requests.get( f"{BASE}/videos/text2video/{info['task_id']}", headers=get_headers() ).json() if r["data"]["task_status"] == "succeed": info["url"] = r["data"]["task_result"]["videos"][0]["url"] info["time"] = round(time.time() - info["start"]) elif r["data"]["task_status"] == "failed": info["error"] = r["data"].get("task_status_msg") time.sleep(10) for model, info in results.items(): print(f"{model}: {info.get('url', info.get('error'))} ({info.get('time', '?')}s)") return results
python# Feature flag for instant rollback KLING_MODEL = os.environ.get("KLING_MODEL_VERSION", "kling-v2-master") body["model_name"] = KLING_MODEL # To rollback: export KLING_MODEL_VERSION=kling-v1-6
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-04 | fail→pass | 14,633 | 3,784 | -74% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,253 | 1,984 | +58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | 21,299 | 17,301 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,884 | 3,637 | +26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 23,327 | 32,961 | +41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,909 | 7,351 | +50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 21,616 | 18,480 | -15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,830 | 5,041 | +32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 7,380 | 9,111 | +23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,318 | 2,060 | +56% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 23,269 | 8,839 | -62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,363 | 1,959 | -42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 18,371 | 9,036 | -51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,945 | 2,906 | +49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 9,423 | 10,107 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,377 | 1,977 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 20,114 | 9,380 | -53% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,614 | 1,691 | -35% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 5,945 | 7,645 | +29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,024 | 1,621 | +58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 14,274 | 2,290 | -84% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,460 | 1,633 | +12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 13,986 | 8,292 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,502 | 1,851 | +23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 13,508 | 2,185 | -84% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,480 | 1,627 | +10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 22,149 | 9,177 | -59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 969 | 1,914 | +98% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 19,125 | 8,637 | -55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 898 | 1,828 | +104% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 12,216 | 2,946 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,078 | 1,783 | +65% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 11,977 | 2,002 | -83% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,763 | 1,557 | -12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 17,645 | 4,560 | -74% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,169 | 2,137 | -1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 8,521 | 8,716 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,443 | 2,004 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 4,464 | 4,917 | +10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 819 | 2,099 | +156% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | 18,771 | 12,196 | -35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,072 | 2,430 | +17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 16,480 | 14,524 | -12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,733 | 3,393 | +96% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | fail→pass | 43,936 | 9,104 | -79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 7,437 | 1,952 | -74% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted, and 22 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +57 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.