Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →jezweb/award-application
Write compelling award submissions, grant applications, and competition entries. Maps achievements to selection criteria using evidence-based narratives.
Passed 19 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 19 of 22 without it.
0 fixed19 passed either way3 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Produces award submissions and grant applications that address every criterion with quantified evidence. The goal is a document where every paragraph earns points on the scorecard.
Ask the user for:
If the user has a URL for the award, fetch the criteria page. Many awards publish judging guides or past winner profiles — these are gold for understanding what evaluators value.
Create a working table before writing anything:
| Criterion | Key achievement | Evidence/metric | Story or example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Innovation | AI workflow automation | Report time: 3 days to 4 hours | Staff training program, 12 people |
| Growth | Revenue increase | 40% YoY, $X to $Y | New service line launched Q2 |
| Community | Pro bono program | 200 hours, 15 local orgs | Bushfire recovery site builds |
Every criterion must have at least one entry. A blank row means a missing section in the submission — and missing sections lose marks or trigger automatic rejection.
If the user cannot provide evidence for a criterion, flag it explicitly. Better to know the gap now than to submit vague filler.
Address criteria in the exact order they appear on the application form. Judges often score sequentially — don't make them hunt for your answer to criterion 3 buried in the criterion 1 section.
For each criterion, use the STAR structure:
test cases passed, vs 19 / 22 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.