Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Run a read-only verification pass after implementation to check whether completion claims are real, validation actually ran, and obvious edge cases or regressions were missed.
.claude/skills/kentunderage549-verification-gate/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -62% | 0% |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -67% | 0% |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -46% | 0% |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -58% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | -85% | 0% |
Use this skill when the implementation should not be accepted without a separate challenge pass.
Collect a verification context from a git repo:
bashpython3 {baseDir}/scripts/verification_context.py --repo /path/to/repo
Then run the portable verifier prompt from references/prompt-template.md.
python3 {baseDir}/scripts/verification_context.py ...| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-14 | fail→pass | 7,280 | 1,786 | -75% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,263 | 483 | -62% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 4,338 | 5,236 | +21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 220 | 557 | +153% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 4,618 | 4,468 | -3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 222 | 499 | +125% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 8,351 | 5,299 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,273 | 1,078 | -15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 3,984 | 5,525 | +39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 217 | 612 | +182% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→fail | 13,321 | 4,162 | -69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,732 | 415 | -85% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→fail | 6,029 | 4,429 | -27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,040 | 525 | -50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→fail | 6,146 | 3,916 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,279 | 402 | -69% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | 2,129 | 4,125 | +94% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 173 | 453 | +162% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | 4,402 | 4,329 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 212 | 415 | +96% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 8,544 | 4,783 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,492 | 1,061 | -29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 6,471 | 2,835 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,083 | 736 | -32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→fail | 4,305 | 9,148 | +112% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 724 | 1,696 | +134% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 18,556 | 2,126 | -89% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,661 | 555 | -67% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→fail | 17,969 | 5,342 | -70% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,040 | 467 | -85% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 7,333 | 4,060 | -45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,139 | 851 | -25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 5,714 | 1,857 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 964 | 525 | -46% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→fail | 15,976 | 5,539 | -65% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,692 | 480 | -82% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 8,284 | 2,655 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,434 | 596 | -58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 12,271 | 2,960 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,021 | 514 | -75% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→fail | 7,876 | 4,497 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 293 | 471 | +61% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | 4,982 | 5,163 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 218 | 550 | +152% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 11 counted toward the lift figure. The other 11 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of -14 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 11 comparable cases. 8 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.