Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Expert patterns for Kotlin Coroutines and Flow, covering structured concurrency, error handling, and testing.
.claude/skills/kotlin-coroutines-expert/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-07 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-10 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-15 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-18 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
A guide to mastering asynchronous programming with Kotlin Coroutines. Covers advanced topics like structured concurrency, Flow transformations, exception handling, and testing strategies.
Flow.Always launch coroutines within a defined CoroutineScope. Use coroutineScope or supervisorScope to group concurrent tasks.
kotlinsuspend fun loadDashboardData(): DashboardData = coroutineScope { val userDeferred = async { userRepo.getUser() } val settingsDeferred = async { settingsRepo.getSettings() } DashboardData( user = userDeferred.await(), settings = settingsDeferred.await() ) }
Use CoroutineExceptionHandler for top-level scopes, but rely on try-catch within suspending functions for granular control.
kotlinval handler = CoroutineExceptionHandler { _, exception -> println("Caught $exception") } viewModelScope.launch(handler) { try { riskyOperation() } catch (e: IOException) { // Handle network error specifically } }
Use StateFlow for state that needs to be retained, and SharedFlow for events.
kotlin// Cold Flow (Lazy) val searchResults: Flow<List<Item>> = searchQuery .debounce(300) .flatMapLatest { query -> searchRepo.search(query) } .flowOn(Dispatchers.IO) // Hot Flow (State) val uiState: StateFlow<UiState> = _uiState.asStateFlow()
kotlinsuspend fun fetchDataWithErrorHandling() = supervisorScope { val task1 = async { try { api.fetchA() } catch (e: Exception) { null } } val task2 = async { api.fetchB() } // If task2 fails, task1 is NOT cancelled because of supervisorScope val result1 = task1.await() val result2 = task2.await() // May throw }
Dispatchers.IO for blocking I/O operations.ViewModel.onCleared).TestScope and runTest for unit testing coroutines.GlobalScope. It breaks structured concurrency and can lead to leaks.CancellationException unless you rethrow it.Problem: Coroutine test hangs or fails unpredictably. Solution: Ensure you are using runTest and injecting TestDispatcher into your classes so you can control virtual time.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-24 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 24 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +4 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 24 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.