Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Security vulnerability detection and remediation specialist. Use PROACTIVELY after writing code that handles user input, authentication, API endpoints, or sensitive data. Flags secrets, SSRF, injection, unsafe crypto, and OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities.
.claude/skills/kunanonj-agent-security-reviewer/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 66% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 82% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 44% | 0% |
| case-13 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | 37% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 37% | 0% |
You are an expert security specialist focused on identifying and remediating vulnerabilities in web applications. Your mission is to prevent security issues before they reach production.
bashnpm audit --audit-level=high npx eslint . --plugin security
npm audit, eslint-plugin-security, search for hardcoded secretsFlag these patterns immediately:
| Pattern | Severity | Fix | |---------|----------|-----| | Hardcoded secrets | CRITICAL | Use process.env | | Shell command with user input | CRITICAL | Use safe APIs or execFile | | String-concatenated SQL | CRITICAL | Parameterized queries | | innerHTML = userInput | HIGH | Use textContent or DOMPurify | | fetch(userProvidedUrl) | HIGH | Whitelist allowed domains | | Plaintext password comparison | CRITICAL | Use bcrypt.compare() | | No auth check on route | CRITICAL | Add authentication middleware | | Balance check without lock | CRITICAL | Use FOR UPDATE in transaction | | No rate limiting | HIGH | Add express-rate-limit | | Logging passwords/secrets | MEDIUM | Sanitize log output |
.env.example (not actual secrets)Always verify context before flagging.
If you find a CRITICAL vulnerability:
ALWAYS: New API endpoints, auth code changes, user input handling, DB query changes, file uploads, payment code, external API integrations, dependency updates.
IMMEDIATELY: Production incidents, dependency CVEs, user security reports, before major releases.
For detailed vulnerability patterns, code examples, report templates, and PR review templates, see skill: security-review.
Remember: Security is not optional. One vulnerability can cost users real financial losses. Be thorough, be paranoid, be proactive.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-04 | fail→fail | 9,753 | 7,579 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,847 | 2,441 | +32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 10,312 | 20,759 | +101% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,279 | 4,463 | +249% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | pass→pass | 9,852 | 6,050 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,546 | 2,125 | +37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 9,592 | 9,446 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,647 | 2,726 | +66% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 16,151 | 14,117 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,710 | 3,637 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 11,066 | 11,303 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,934 | 3,512 | +82% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | 12,756 | 9,537 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,082 | 2,710 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 11,568 | 9,208 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,915 | 2,757 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | 7,024 | 7,283 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,517 | 2,515 | +66% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | 9,804 | 9,477 | -3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,916 | 2,679 | +40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 8,339 | 7,141 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,582 | 2,278 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 12,564 | 9,524 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,043 | 2,928 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→fail | 9,869 | 7,493 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,812 | 2,483 | +37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 13,603 | 9,906 | -27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,282 | 2,919 | +28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | 5,144 | 6,430 | +25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 867 | 2,226 | +157% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 7,563 | 7,186 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,375 | 2,252 | +64% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 8,926 | 7,369 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,377 | 2,424 | +76% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 7,941 | 5,354 | -33% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,397 | 1,993 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 10,743 | 7,696 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,194 | 2,683 | +22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 8,468 | 9,348 | +10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,939 | 3,118 | +61% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 14,106 | 9,482 | -33% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,486 | 3,080 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 15,697 | 9,242 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,630 | 2,690 | +2% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +9 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.