Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Check whether the documented setup and run paths reliably lead to the real working path
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 88% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 109% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 86% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 85% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 113% | 0% |
Follows the written setup path and reports where the docs drift from reality.
Use when the user wants to know whether the repo documentation is actually trustworthy for an agent starting fresh.
README, setup docs, env docs, and contribution or agent guidance.93/100 if the docs lead to the working path with little or no correction.84/100 if the docs drift in places but an agent can still get to the right setup or run path without much guesswork.68/100 if the docs are stale enough that the agent has to reconstruct important steps from the tree or CI.27/100 if the docs point the agent down the wrong path or omit key steps you need to proceed.12/100 if the real path depends on private docs or internal context that is not available in the repo.81, 85, or 92 over a multiple of ten when that is the more honest read.Reply in plain text only (no markdown fences, no # headings, no emphasis syntax). Use this layout:
First line: Docs Reliability Score: <score>/100
Then a short summary paragraph.
Then the line Problems followed by one bullet per line using - .
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.