Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Discover and evaluate Laravel packages via LaraPlugins.io MCP. Use when the user wants to find plugins, check package health, or assess Laravel/PHP compatibility.
.claude/skills/laravel-plugin-discovery/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Find, evaluate, and choose healthy Laravel packages using the LaraPlugins.io MCP server.
LaraPlugins MCP server must be configured. Add to your ~/.claude.json mcpServers:
json"laraplugins": { "type": "http", "url": "https://laraplugins.io/mcp/plugins" }
No API key required — the server is free for the Laravel community.
The LaraPlugins MCP provides two primary tools:
Search packages by keyword, health score, vendor, and version compatibility.
Parameters:
text_search (string, optional): Keyword to search (e.g. "permission", "admin", "api")health_score (string, optional): Filter by health band — Healthy, Medium, Unhealthy, or Unratedlaravel_compatibility (string, optional): Filter by Laravel version — "5", "6", "7", "8", "9", "10", "11", "12", "13"php_compatibility (string, optional): Filter by PHP version — "7.4", "8.0", "8.1", "8.2", "8.3", "8.4", "8.5"vendor_filter (string, optional): Filter by vendor name (e.g. "spatie", "laravel")page (number, optional): Page number for paginationFetch detailed metrics, readme content, and version history for a specific package.
Parameters:
package (string, required): Full Composer package name (e.g. "spatie/laravel-permission")include_versions (boolean, optional): Include version history in responseWhen the user wants to discover packages for a feature:
SearchPluginTool with relevant keywordsWhen the user wants to assess a specific package:
GetPluginDetailsTool with the package nameWhen the user needs Laravel or PHP version compatibility:
laravel_compatibility filter set to their versionSearchPluginTool({
text_search: "authentication",
health_score: "Healthy"
})Returns packages matching "authentication" with healthy status:
SearchPluginTool({
text_search: "admin panel",
laravel_compatibility: "12"
})Returns packages compatible with Laravel 12.
GetPluginDetailsTool({
package: "spatie/laravel-permission",
include_versions: true
})Returns:
SearchPluginTool({
vendor_filter: "spatie",
health_score: "Healthy"
})Returns all healthy packages from vendor "spatie".
| Health Band | Meaning | |-------------|---------| | Healthy | Active maintenance, recent updates | | Medium | Occasional updates, may need attention | | Unhealthy | Abandoned or infrequently maintained | | Unrated | Not yet assessed |
Recommendation: Prefer Healthy packages for production applications.
| Version | Notes | |---------|-------| | 13 | Latest Laravel | | 12 | Current stable | | 11 | Still widely used | | 10 | Legacy but common | | 5-9 | Deprecated |
Recommendation: Match the target project's Laravel version.
typescript// Find healthy, Laravel 12 compatible packages for permissions SearchPluginTool({ text_search: "permission", health_score: "Healthy", laravel_compatibility: "12" })
Each result includes:
spatie/laravel-permission)The detailed response includes:
| Scenario | Recommended Approach | |----------|---------------------| | "What package for auth?" | Search "auth" with healthy filter | | "Is spatie/package still maintained?" | Get details, check health score | | "Need Laravel 12 packages" | Search with laravel_compatibility: "12" | | "Find admin panel packages" | Search "admin panel", review results | | "Check vendor reputation" | Search by vendor, check details |
health_score: "Healthy" for production projectslaravel_compatibility matches the target projectlaravel-patterns — Laravel architecture and patternslaravel-tdd — Test-driven development for Laravellaravel-security — Laravel security best practicesdocumentation-lookup — General library documentation lookup (Context7)| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 15 counted toward the lift figure. The other 7 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +32 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 15 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.