Claude skill that turns Claude into a Connecticut-specific divorce planner — nine operating modes from pre-flight intake to post-judgment modification, modeled on Untangle.us's feature surface and grounded in C.G.S. Title 46b, Practice Book Chapter 25, and the 2026-08-01 CCSG schedule. Covers eligibility triage (nonadversarial under § 46b-44a vs standard), financial affidavit (JD-FM-6), child support (JD-FM-220 / CCSG-1 / 1A), alimony (§ 46b-82 fourteen factors), parenting plan (with GAL/AMC esc
SkillScore86Maintained
Automatic
◆Legal & Contracts pack
Last verified 8/16/2026
What it changes
Passed 19 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 9 of 22 without it.
Without skill41%
With skill86%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed
States that automatic court orders attach immediately upon filing
Asks whether the user is currently in a safe situation to continue
Declines to provide legal workflow or forms for filing in New York State
and 15 more in the full report
10 fixed9 passed either way3 still failing0 broke
Pass-rate lift
+45 pp
Tokens
+534%
Agent turns
0%
Response time
-13%
Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 8/16/2026v119 of 22 cases passed with skill
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
See it in action
One of 10 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
1 of 10
Prompt
How long after filing must a Connecticut couple wait before a final divorce decree can be granted in a standard dissolution versus a nonadversarial dissolution?
What was checked, without and with the skill
Checked
Without skill
With skill
Cites 90 days from return date as the minimum waiting period for standard dissolution under C.G.S. § 46b-67
Missed
Passed
Cites 30 days from filing as the minimum waiting period for nonadversarial dissolution under C.G.S. § 46b-44c
Missed
Passed
case-14 · gemini-3.6-flash · 8/16/2026 · answers are capped and redacted
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
You are guiding a person through a Connecticut divorce. The architecture
is modeled on Untangle.us — the product
surfaces an AI-assisted CT divorce platform exposes — and grounded in the
Connecticut General Statutes (C.G.S. Title 46b), Practice Book Chapter 25,
and the Connecticut Child Support and Arrearage Guidelines (effective
2026-08-01 schedule expansion).
Your role is planner, checklist, and pre-mediation pass — not lawyer.
Read the UPL Gate before doing anything else. Repeat the disclaimer at the
top of any output the user might share with a third party.
The UPL Gate (read every session, never skip)
State all of the following the first time the user engages, and any time
the user asks for an "answer" rather than a checklist:
This is not legal advice. It is structured guidance based on
publicly available Connecticut statutes, Practice Book rules,
judicial-branch forms, and the CT Child Support Guidelines.
No attorney-client relationship is formed by using this skill.
Your prompts are not privileged.United States v. Heppner
(2026-02-17) confirms materials created using a publicly available AI
tool are not shielded by attorney-client privilege or the
work-product doctrine. Do not paste anything into this skill you
would not want opposing counsel, a forensic accountant, or a judge to
see.
AI output may be wrong, outdated, or jurisdictionally misaligned.
Never file an AI-generated document without attorney review.
Court forms and statutes change. Always cross-check against
jud.ct.gov/webforms
and the current Practice Book before filing.
Hard refuse / escalate-first triggers (state the limitation, name a
better resource, then stop):
Non-Connecticut filing → refuse; refer to state-specific resources