Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Performs structured compliance review, clause redlining, and drafting suggestions for legal documents (privacy policies, data processing agreements, vendor and SaaS contracts) against India's DPDPA 2023 and the EU GDPR. Flags clauses as compliant, at-risk, or non-compliant with reasoning, and proposes ready-to-use model replacement language.
.claude/skills/lawve-ai-dpdpa-gdpr-review-parth-desai/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-21 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 61% | 0% |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 10% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 19% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 68% | 0% |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 34% | 0% |
Performs structured compliance review, redlining, and drafting suggestions on legal documents against DPDPA 2023 (India) and GDPR (EU/EEA). Produces annotated output with:
On receiving a document, determine:
> If jurisdiction or parties are ambiguous, state your assumption clearly before proceeding.
Parse the document into logical clause groups. Map each to the relevant legal obligation:
| Clause Group | DPDPA Reference | GDPR Reference | |---|---|---| | Purpose of processing | §6 – Notice | Art. 13/14 – Transparency | | Lawful basis / consent | §6–§9 | Art. 6 / Art. 7 | | Data fiduciary / controller identity | §8 | Art. 13(1)(a) | | Data principal / subject rights | §11–§14 | Art. 15–22 | | Data retention / erasure | §8(7), §13 | Art. 5(1)(e), Art. 17 | | Cross-border transfer | §16 | Art. 44–49 | | Children's data / parental consent | §9 | Art. 8 | | Grievance / DPO contact | §8(10), §13(5) | Art. 37–39 | | Security obligations | §8(5) | Art. 32 | | Breach notification | §8(6) | Art. 33/34 | | Data processor obligations | §8(2)–(3) | Art. 28 | | Sub-processor / consent manager | §3(5), §8(2) | Art. 28(2) |
For each clause group, apply checks from references/dpdpa-checklist.md and references/gdpr-checklist.md.
When flagging or rewriting a clause, use this format:
──────────────────────────────────────────
CLAUSE: [Clause title / section number]
STATUS: ⚠️ SUSPECT | 🔴 NON-COMPLIANT | ✅ COMPLIANT
LAW: DPDPA §__ | GDPR Art. __
ISSUE: [Plain-language explanation of risk]
ORIGINAL TEXT:
"[paste original clause]"
REDLINE SUGGESTION:
"[Proposed replacement or addition]"
RISK LEVEL: HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW
──────────────────────────────────────────After full analysis, output a Compliance Summary table:
## Compliance Summary
| Area | DPDPA Status | GDPR Status | Risk |
|------|-------------|------------|------|
| Consent mechanism | ⚠️ Weak | ✅ OK | Medium |
| Data retention | 🔴 Missing | 🔴 Missing | High |
| Children's data | N/A | ⚠️ Unclear | Medium |
| Cross-border transfer | ⚠️ Unaddressed | ✅ SCCs present | High |
| Breach notification | ✅ Present | ✅ Present | Low |
...
Overall Risk: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
Recommended Actions: [numbered list]For every 🔴 NON-COMPLIANT or ⚠️ SUSPECT finding, provide:
Reference references/model-clauses.md for standard clause templates.
| File | When to Read | |------|-------------| | references/dpdpa-checklist.md | DPDPA-specific clause checks | | references/gdpr-checklist.md | GDPR-specific clause checks | | references/model-clauses.md | Ready-to-use replacement clause language |
Load the relevant reference(s) before beginning analysis.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.