Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →lawve-ai/eu-ai-act-classification
Classify an AI system under the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, KI-Verordnung) and determine compliance obligations. Walks Art. 3(1) AI system definition (7-criteria test), Art. 2 scope exclusions, Art. 5 prohibited practice screening, Annex I product safety, Annex III high-risk use cases (biometrics, critical infrastructure, education, employment, credit scoring, insurance, law enforcement, migration, justice), Art. 6(3) narrow procedural exception, Art. 51-56 GPAI with the 10^25 FLOP sys
Passed 17 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 11 of 22 without it.
and 7 more in the full report
7 fixed10 passed either way4 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
This benchmark measured an earlier version of the skill.
One of 7 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
We are developing an automated recruitment screening tool to analyze candidate resumes for job openings across our European offices. Could you conduct a regulatory classification for this software under EU AI Act Regulation 2024/1689? Please provide the complete reporting package, including a detailed classification memo citing relevant articles, a structured entry for our internal risk register, and a concise executive summary for board review.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The output classifies the recruitment tool as high-risk under Annex III. | Passed | Passed |
| The response asks targeted follow-up questions from the Quick Question Set to address incomplete facts. | Missed | Passed |
| The response explicitly includes horizontal AI literacy obligations under Article 4. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Classify AI systems under Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 and determine obligations by role.
Important: This skill provides compliance workflow support, not legal advice. Always cite specific EU AI Act articles. Where facts are incomplete, state assumptions explicitly and ask targeted follow-up questions.
Follow this decision tree strictly in order. Stop at the first match.
Confirm the AI system falls within scope:
If out of scope, document why and stop.
Check every Article 5 category. If any match → PROHIBITED. Stop unless a narrow law enforcement exception applies.
Categories (check all ten: the original eight, plus Art. 5(1)(ba) non-consensual intimate material and (bb) CSAM, both applying from 2 December 2026):
→ For the complete checklist with examples and edge cases, read references/prohibited-practices.md.
Annex I path: Is the AI a product or safety component under EU harmonisation legislation (e.g., MDR, IVDR) subject to third-party conformity assessment? → HIGH-RISK
test cases passed, vs 11 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.