Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →lawve-ai/icc-jeanne-sulzer
Research, drafting, and analysis involving the International Criminal Court (Rome Statute system). Enforces a verification-first methodology — every case-law, decision, filing, warrant, and statement citation is verified against an authoritative primary source (icc-cpi.int, legal-tools.org) in the current conversation before it appears in an output. Foundational texts (Rome Statute, Elements of Crimes, RPE, Regulations of the Court) may be cited from project knowledge when present.
Passed 20 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 14 of 22 without it.
and 4 more in the full report
6 fixed15 passed either way2 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 6 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
What level of verification is sufficient if a draft simply mentions that an arrest warrant was issued by Pre-Trial Chamber I against a specific individual on a given date without quoting its text?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Confirms that confirming document number, date, and chamber satisfies existence-level verification. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
For any case-specific document — judgment, decision, warrant, filing, OTP statement — verify before citing. Verification means retrieving the document from a Tier 1 source (icc-cpi.int, legal-tools.org, asp.icc-cpi.int) in the current conversation. The four foundational texts (Rome Statute, Elements of Crimes, Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Regulations of the Court) are the only exception, and only when they are present in project knowledge.
Nothing else may be cited from memory. Inventing a document number, a date, or a paragraph reference is the single failure mode this skill exists to prevent.
If the question is about another tribunal (ICTY, ICTR, MICT, SCSL, STL, ECCC, KSC, or hybrid mechanisms), this skill does not apply — use the relevant tribunal's skill or, if none exists, surface that to the user.
The full procedure is in references/verification-workflow.md. The short
form:
test cases passed, vs 14 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.