Ready to supercharge your AI agents?

Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.

Get Started Free →

Pre-Review — measured AI agent skill | DecimalAI

ledgerhq/pre-review

NewSkillScoreMaintained

Deep code review

Code Reviewby ledgerhq

Links this skill to your agents and keeps it current with the author’s updates.

On-demandOn-demand: invoked explicitly — never occupies your agent's context until called.

Coding pack

1 · One-time — install the CLI (docs ↗)

pip install decimalai

2 · Get the skill — writes .claude/skills/ledgerhq-pre-review/SKILL.md

decimalai skills pull ledgerhq-pre-review --out .claude/skills/

No CLI? Get the same file — curl · raw file

curl -fsSL --create-dirs -o .claude/skills/ledgerhq-pre-review/SKILL.md https://app.decimal.ai/s/ledgerhq-pre-review/SKILL.md

Raw file: /s/ledgerhq-pre-review/SKILL.md ↗ · machine-readable summary at /s/ledgerhq-pre-review.json ↗

In productionGlobal

how this skill behaves on real traffic · last 30 days

No production data for this skill yet — usage numbers appear here once agents start running it.

Anonymized aggregate across every org using this skill — proof from real production use, not a demo.

Does this skill help? · Benchmark: with vs. withoutsign in to run this on your agents

22 test cases from the publisher’s eval.yaml · each run twice on gemini-3.6-flash — with the skill injected, then without · last run 6h ago

—-22% tokens0% turns73% of whole cases pass with skill (16/22)

Test case	Without → With	Effect	Δ tokens	Δ turns
case-06	✗→✓	▲ Improved	-25%	0%
case-08	✗→✓	▲ Improved	-69%	0%
case-16	✗→✓	▲ Improved	-69%	0%
case-18	✗→✓	▲ Improved	-59%	0%
case-19	✗→✓	▲ Improved	-49%	0%

Showing 5 of 22 cases

SkillSafety

✓ 3 of 3 passed

Code scan15 of 15 checks clean

0 critical · 0 warning · 0 info — scanner v4 — 8/3/2026

live_secretremote_code_executionreverse_shelldata_exfiltrationssrf_metadataagent_snoopinganti_refusaldestructive_commandsobfuscated_unicodeunicode_homoglyphopaque_blobsuspicious_urltool_overreachtrigger_abuseprompt_injection_phrasing

IntentSafe

LLM judge · does the skill do what it claims

ContentClean

LLM judge · policy & harmful-content review

Source

Imported

ledgerhq / ledger-live

.agents/skills/pre-review/SKILL.md

View on GitHub ↗

License MITImported 8/3/2026Version v1

Skill contents

SKILL.md

Pre-Review

Deep code review

Process

Run git diff develop...HEAD to get the full diff.

Launch 5 code-reviewer agents in parallel, each with a different focus:

A — Architecture & MVVM compliance
B — Correctness (edge cases, null handling, error states)
C — Code quality & conventions (Lumen UI, TypeScript, naming, new deps)
D — General review — DRY, KISS, missing tests, anything that would slow down a reviewer or cause future regressions
E — Security: invoke the detect-data-leaks skill for PII; check for auth bypass, injection, SSRF, crypto misuse; scan the diff for hardcoded secrets, tokens, API keys, or private keys.

Each agent prompt: _"Review the diff vs develop. Focus on FOCUS]. Return findings with file:line, severity (🔴 Critical / 🟡 Suggestion / 🟢 Nice to have), and suggested fix."_

Merge + deduplicate findings. Present grouped by severity:

🔴 Critical — path/to/file.ts:42 — issue → fix 🟡 Suggestion — ... 🟢 Nice to have — ... Summary: X critical, Y suggestions, Z nice-to-haves

Ask the user which items to fix: "all criticals", "all", "#1,#2, #3", or "skip" → /create-pr

Want to see if ledgerhq/pre-review would activate on your phrasing? Try it before you install — no LLM call, no signup.

Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.