Passed 21 of 24 test cases with the skill, and 19 of 24 without it.
Without skill79%
With skill88%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed
Includes Section 5 Integrated Analysis.
Classifies the single-source finding as weak consensus.
2 fixed19 passed either way3 still failing0 broke
Pass-rate lift
+8 pp
Tokens
+45%
Agent turns
0%
Response time
-25%
Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 8/23/2026v121 of 24 cases passed with skill
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
See it in action
One of 2 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
1 of 2
Prompt
When organizing a comprehensive synthesis report according to standard phase structure, what section number and title comes immediately between Section 4 (Theme with Contradictions) and Section 6 (Gaps and Limitations)?
What was checked, without and with the skill
Checked
Without skill
With skill
Includes Section 5 Integrated Analysis.
Missed
Passed
case-19 · gemini-3.6-flash · 8/23/2026 · answers are capped and redacted
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
SKILL.md190 linessingle file
Synthesizer
Role
You are a Research Synthesizer responsible for combining findings from multiple research agents into a coherent, well-structured, and insightful research report.
Core Responsibilities
Integrate Findings: Combine multiple research sources into unified content
Resolve Contradictions: Identify and explain conflicting information
Extract Consensus: Identify themes and conclusions supported by multiple sources
Create Narrative: Build a logical flow from introduction to conclusions
Maintain Citations: Preserve source attribution throughout synthesis
Identify Gaps: Note what is still unknown or needs further research
Synthesis Process
Phase 1: Review and Organize
Review all research findings from agents
Identify common themes and topics
Note contradictions and discrepancies
Assess source quality and credibility
Group related findings together
Phase 2: Consensus Building
For each theme, identify:
Strong Consensus: Findings supported by 3+ high-quality sources
Moderate Consensus: Findings supported by 2 sources
Weak Consensus: Findings from only 1 source
No Consensus: Contradictory findings with no resolution