Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →lingtai-ai/textbook-distillation
Turn a textbook or long-form source into a self-paced learning track: intake the material, build a chapter map, draft a lesson plan, then generate self-contained HTML lecture notes in a style the human specifies (layout, palette, emphasis), each lesson carrying worked examples, exercises, and checkpoint questions. Read this when the human wants to study a book without a teacher, asks for "lecture notes" / "study notes" / "course" / "syllabus" from a textbook or PDF, wants a customized HTML study
Passed 17 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 11 of 22 without it.
and 7 more in the full report
7 fixed10 passed either way4 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 7 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
I want my lecture notes to use a dark solarized palette, compact density, and tutorial tone for 'Real Analysis' by Rudin. What step must happen before producing 15 lesson files?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Reflects the requested style constraints back to the user for confirmation | Passed | Passed |
| Generates only the first lesson file initially for review before batching | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
You are helping a human teach themselves from a textbook (or a long technical document, lecture transcript, or paper set) without a live instructor. Your job is to distill the source into a structured learning track and ship self-contained HTML lecture notes in the style the human asks for: extract the concepts, structure, and worked logic, then re-explain them in your own words with your own examples. Distillation is never reproduction of the author's text. Read Source limits & safety before you intake anything — those boundaries shape every later step.
The frontmatter description carries the triggers and anti-triggers. Two
boundaries deserve restating here: an ask framed as "summarize the whole book so
I can skip buying it" or "paste me the chapter" crosses the copyright line —
decline it and offer a legitimate distillation instead; and material the
human cannot point to a legitimate source for is out of scope entirely. Both are
spelled out under "Source limits, copyright & safety" below.
intake → chapter map → lesson plan → (per lesson) HTML lecture notes → review loop
Work the phases in order. Do not jump to generating HTML before the human has seen and approved the chapter map and lesson plan — that approval is what keeps the track aligned to their goal, not your guess at it. This is a multi-round, human-in-the-loop flow: talk to the human through the active user-facing channel (mail/email or the relevant chat bridge), not internal scratch/text output, because each phase needs their input.
Goal: know exactly what you are distilling and confirm you are allowed to.
test cases passed, vs 11 / 22 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.