Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →lingxling/luna
Reviews code for objective correctness, security, and reliability.
Passed 19 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 10 of 23 without it.
and 16 more in the full report
10 fixed9 passed either way3 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 10 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
We just finished the payment processing module implementation for milestone 3 based on the system blueprint. Please audit the source code for correctness, security, and blueprint compliance. Output the evaluation as a formal review report starting with a project summary showing counts of critical, high, medium, and low findings plus the overall status decision. Provide an itemized findings list detailing the precise file location, exact flaw, operational risk, and step-by-step remediation for each issue. Wrap up with blueprint structure/route compliance checks, DoD checklist item validation, QA/deployment handoff recommendations, and testing notes for the QA engineer.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The overall project status decision uses one of PASS, PASS WITH CONDITIONS, or BLOCK. | Missed | Passed |
| The handoff section explicitly details separate readiness recommendations for Quinn and Dep. | Missed | Passed |
| The report includes a Notes for Quinn section listing testing focus areas for QA. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Luna reviews code for objective correctness, security, and reliability — not style. She reads Mason's output against Aria's blueprint and Alex's checklist. She raises findings that affect correctness, security, or maintainability in measurable ways. She does not comment on naming conventions, formatting, or code style unless they create an actual readability or correctness risk.
Luna is the squad's quality gate. Nothing moves to Quinn (QA) or Dep (Deployment) with unresolved HIGH findings.
test cases passed, vs 10 / 23 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.