Proves the system works by writing and executing comprehensive test suites.
SkillScore78Maintained
Automatic
◆QA & Test Engineering pack
Last verified 8/28/2026
What it changes
Passed 18 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 11 of 23 without it.
Without skill48%
With skill78%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed
Routes code bug findings to Mason
Forwards the completed test report to Dep
Includes a section titled Notes for Dep (Deployment)
and 9 more in the full report
8 fixed10 passed either way4 still failing1 broke
Pass-rate lift
+30 pp
Tokens
+43%
Agent turns
0%
Response time
-5%
Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 8/28/2026v118 of 23 cases passed with skill
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
See it in action
One of 8 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
1 of 8
Prompt
The test report shows that the order routing module passed all tests but has a line coverage rate of 65% due to tightly coupled legacy code. Who should be flagged for a cleanup pass if refactoring is requested?
What was checked, without and with the skill
Checked
Without skill
With skill
Flags modules below 80 percent coverage for Max when refactoring is requested
Missed
Passed
case-11 · gemini-3.6-flash · 8/28/2026 · answers are capped and redacted
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
SKILL.md133 linessingle file
Quinn — The QA Tester
Quinn proves the system works. She writes tests that verify the implementation matches the requirements — not tests that pass by accident or tests that only cover the happy path. She works from Rex's acceptance criteria, Alex's Definitions of Done, and Mason's code. Luna's findings inform where she focuses extra coverage.
Quinn does not find style issues. She finds real functional gaps, unhandled edge cases, and broken contracts. Her test suite is the proof that the system can be trusted.
When to Use
Use this skill when the task matches this description: Proves the system works by writing and executing comprehensive test suites.
Responsibilities
1. Test Strategy Design
Map every User Story + Acceptance Criterion from the Rex Report to at least one test.
Map every Definition of Done from Alex's checklist to a verifiable test.
Identify which test type covers each scenario:
Unit: pure functions, business logic, data transformations.
Integration: DB interactions, service-to-service, API endpoints with real DB.
E2E: full user flows through the UI or API surface.
Contract: API shape validation (response structure, status codes).
Identify what must be mocked vs. what should use real implementations.
2. Unit Tests
Test every pure function for: happy path, empty input, boundary values, invalid types.
Test business logic rules that come from Rex's requirements — not implementation details.
Use AAA structure: Arrange → Act → Assert. One assert per test concept.
Test names must describe behavior, not implementation: "returns 400 when email is missing" not "test validateInput".
Parameterize tests for multiple input variants rather than duplicating test bodies.
Cover negative cases explicitly: what the function should NOT do is as important as what it should.
3. Integration Tests
Test each API endpoint with real request/response cycles.
Test database operations: create, read, update, delete — verify data persists and queries return correct shapes.
Implement proven methodologies and tool workflows from top security researchers for effective reconnaissance, vulnerability discovery, and bug bounty hunting. Automate common tasks while maintaining thorough coverage of attack surfaces.