Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Reference document for monopoly scale-benchmarks.
.claude/skills/lingxling-scale-benchmarks/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 16% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -7% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 50% | 0% |
| case-21 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -13% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -7% | 0% |
Requests per second (avg) = DAU × avg_requests_per_user_per_day / 86400
Requests per second (peak) = avg_RPS × peak_multiplier
Peak multipliers by app type:
Social media: 5–10×
E-commerce: 3–5× (higher during sales)
News / media: 10–20× (breaking news spike)
B2B SaaS: 2–3× (business hours spike)
Gaming: 5–15× (event-driven)Storage per day = requests_per_day × avg_payload_size
Storage per year = storage_per_day × 365
With replication = storage_per_year × replication_factor (3× typical)
With CDN/cache = reduce by cache_hit_ratio (80% hit = 20% origin load)
Common payload sizes:
Tweet / short text: 500B
Social post with text: 2KB
Profile data: 5KB
Image (compressed): 200KB–2MB
Video (per minute): 50MB (720p), 150MB (1080p)
API JSON response: 1–20KBInbound bandwidth = avg_request_size × RPS
Outbound bandwidth = avg_response_size × RPS
Convert: 1 Gbps = 125 MB/s
10 Gbps = 1.25 GB/s| Technology | Single Node Writes | Reads (with replicas) | Recommended Shard/Cluster Trigger | |------------|-------------------|----------------------|----------------------------------| | PostgreSQL | ~5K–20K writes/s | ~50K–200K reads/s | >5TB data or >20K writes/s | | MySQL | ~10K–25K writes/s | ~60K–250K reads/s | >5TB or >25K writes/s | | MongoDB | ~20K–50K writes/s | ~50K–100K reads/s | >100GB or >50K writes/s | | Cassandra | ~200K–1M writes/s | ~200K–500K reads/s | Almost never needs explicit sharding | | DynamoDB | Unlimited (managed) | Unlimited (managed) | Use provisioned capacity mode | | Redis | ~500K–1M ops/s | Same | >50GB data or cluster needed | | Elasticsearch | ~10K–50K docs/s | ~1K–10K queries/s | >100M documents per index |
| Technology | Max Throughput | Max Consumers | Retention | |------------|----------------|---------------|-----------| | Kafka | 1M+ msgs/s per cluster | Unlimited consumer groups | Configurable (days–forever) | | RabbitMQ | ~50K–100K msgs/s | Limited by connections | Until consumed | | SQS Standard | Unlimited (AWS-managed) | Unlimited | 14 days | | SQS FIFO | 3K msgs/s per queue | Per group | 14 days | | Redis Pub/Sub | ~1M msgs/s | Limited by subscribers | None (fire-and-forget) |
| Technology | Max Memory (single) | Max Throughput | Latency | |------------|--------------------|--------------|----| | Redis | ~1TB RAM | ~1M ops/s | <1ms | | Memcached | ~64GB RAM | ~1M ops/s | <1ms | | In-process (Caffeine/Guava) | JVM heap | Unlimited (local) | <0.1ms |
Avg RPS: ~1–5 RPS
Peak RPS: ~10–50 RPS
DB size/year: ~10–50GB
Infra needed: Single server, managed DB (RDS t3.medium), basic CDN
Monthly cost: $50–200Avg RPS: ~10–50 RPS
Peak RPS: ~100–500 RPS
DB size/year: ~100–500GB
Infra needed: 2–4 app servers, RDS r5.large, Redis t3.medium, CDN
Monthly cost: $300–800Avg RPS: ~100–500 RPS
Peak RPS: ~1K–5K RPS
DB size/year: ~1–5TB
Infra needed: ASG (5–10 app servers), RDS r5.xlarge + 2 replicas, Redis cluster, CDN, ALB
Monthly cost: $2K–8KAvg RPS: ~1K–5K RPS
Peak RPS: ~10K–50K RPS
DB size/year: ~10–50TB
Infra needed: ASG (20–50 servers), DB sharding or Aurora, Redis cluster, Kafka, CDN, WAF
Monthly cost: $20K–80KAvg RPS: ~10K–50K RPS
Peak RPS: ~100K–500K RPS
DB size/year: ~100–500TB
Infra needed: Multi-region, microservices, distributed DB (Cassandra/CockroachDB), full CDN, dedicated SRE
Monthly cost: $200K–2M+| Tier | Availability | Monthly Downtime Allowed | |------|-------------|--------------------------| | 99% | Basic | 7.2 hours/month | | 99.9% (three nines) | Standard production | 43.8 minutes/month | | 99.95% | Important services | 21.9 minutes/month | | 99.99% (four nines) | Critical services | 4.38 minutes/month | | 99.999% (five nines) | Telecom / payments | 26 seconds/month |
Achieving four nines requires: Multi-AZ deployment, automated failover, zero-downtime deploys, chaos engineering, 24/7 on-call.
User perceived latency targets:
< 100ms → Feels instant
100–300ms → Acceptable for most interactions
300ms–1s → Noticeable; optimize if possible
> 1s → Frustrating; unacceptable for critical paths
Network latency by distance (approximate):
Same datacenter: 0.5ms
Same region (AZ): 1–2ms
Cross-region US: 30–60ms
US to Europe: 80–120ms
US to Asia: 150–250ms
Database query targets:
Simple key-value: < 1ms (cache)
Simple DB query: < 5ms
Complex query: < 50ms
Reporting query: < 500ms (async if > 1s)| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 25,575 | 20,734 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,292 | 4,976 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 22,135 | 17,718 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,319 | 5,159 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 20,412 | 7,818 | -62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,617 | 3,349 | -7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 13,987 | 12,520 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,256 | 3,805 | +69% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 18,328 | 16,286 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,769 | 4,127 | +49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 10,355 | 5,157 | -50% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,674 | 2,955 | +77% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 14,657 | 7,060 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,078 | 3,110 | +50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 23,558 | 8,532 | -64% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,520 | 3,076 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 14,527 | 2,149 | -85% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,319 | 2,152 | -7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 30,657 | 3,426 | -89% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,336 | 2,303 | +72% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 9,365 | 6,444 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,749 | 2,829 | +62% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 14,294 | 4,587 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,143 | 2,615 | +22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 6,367 | 3,319 | -48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 936 | 2,443 | +161% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | 4,752 | 2,940 | -38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 680 | 2,301 | +238% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 23,078 | 5,195 | -77% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,713 | 2,580 | -5% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 15,538 | 3,088 | -80% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,415 | 2,234 | -7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 16,427 | 7,515 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,605 | 2,971 | +14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 10,813 | 2,043 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,758 | 2,171 | +23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 13,315 | 2,813 | -79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,175 | 2,273 | +5% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 7,550 | 4,302 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,314 | 2,520 | +92% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 15,526 | 10,637 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,674 | 3,461 | +29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | 16,353 | 11,149 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,898 | 3,649 | +26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | fail→pass | 26,767 | 22,959 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,860 | 5,317 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-24 | pass→pass | 9,906 | 2,124 | -79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,503 | 2,090 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-25 | pass→pass | 8,206 | 4,495 | -45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,545 | 2,480 | +61% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-26 | pass→pass | 18,112 | 7,787 | -57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,408 | 2,889 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-27 | fail→pass | 13,831 | 4,588 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,234 | 2,384 | +7% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 27 cases were attempted, and 26 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +41 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 26 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.