Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →luchasarie/bro
Re-explain the previous assistant message in a much simpler way — for when the reply made you go 'bro what'. Use /bro to get a plain-language version of the last answer.
Passed 19 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 15 of 23 without it.
and 6 more in the full report
8 fixed11 passed either way0 still failing4 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
This benchmark measured an earlier version of the skill.
One of 8 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Context - Previous assistant message: | Service | Status | Port | | --- | --- | --- | | Postgres | Active | 5432 | | Redis | Stopped | 6379 | User request: /bro
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Omits markdown table formatting. | Passed | Passed |
| Explains the active Postgres service status in plain prose. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
The user just typed /bro, maybe with some text after it.
Your job: re-explain the input in a much simpler way, like you're explaining it to a smart friend over a beer.
What the input is:
/bro, that text is the input. It can be anything the user pasted: a paragraph, an error message, an email, a doc, legalese./bro, the input is YOUR most recent assistant message. It didn't land: too dense, too jargon-heavy, or too formal./bro and no previous assistant message in this conversation, just say there's nothing to simplify yet, bro.test cases passed, vs 15 / 23 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.