Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Liquid Architecture enables the AI system to modify and optimize its own codebase in real-time without human intervention. This God-Mode protocol allows the agent to analyze, refactor, and improve cod
.claude/skills/majiayu000-liquid-architecture/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 141% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 81% | 0% |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 78% | 0% |
| case-21 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 102% | 0% |
| case-13 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | 130% | 0% |
(Select at least one profile to enable specific modules)
Liquid Architecture enables the AI system to modify and optimize its own codebase in real-time without human intervention. This God-Mode protocol allows the agent to analyze, refactor, and improve code dynamically, adapting to new requirements and fixing bugs autonomously. The system uses LLM-powered code analysis, AST manipulation, and runtime instrumentation to achieve continuous self-improvement.
algorithmic-self-discovery, cognitive-governanceself-validation-cicd, skill-generatorcode-review (manual review vs self-modification)system-thinking, refactoring-strategiespython# Example implementation following best practices def example_function(): # Your implementation here pass
.env.example keys: API_KEY, DATABASE_URL (no values)| Type | Focus Area | Required Scenarios / Mocks | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Unit | Core Logic | Must cover primary logic and at least 3 edge/error cases. Target minimum 80% coverage | | Integration | DB / API | All external API calls or database connections must be mocked during unit tests | | E2E | User Journey | Critical user flows to test | | Performance | Latency / Load | Benchmark requirements | | Security | Vuln / Auth | SAST/DAST or dependency audit | | Frontend | UX / A11y | Accessibility checklist (WCAG), Performance Budget (Lighthouse score) |
request_iderror_rate, latency, queue_depth(ข้อกำหนดสำหรับ AI Agent ในการคิดและแก้ปัญหาเมื่อเกิดข้อผิดพลาด)
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 46,678 | 30,236 | -35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 8,253 | 6,728 | -18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 37,756 | 28,707 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 8,247 | 8,034 | -3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 42,291 | 29,973 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 8,028 | 6,816 | -15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | 17,840 | 28,707 | +61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,038 | 5,936 | +95% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 21,428 | 43,479 | +103% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,628 | 8,740 | +141% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 17,673 | 23,233 | +31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,663 | 6,278 | +136% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 17,278 | 33,589 | +94% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,033 | 7,364 | +143% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 7,597 | 3,537 | -53% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,167 | 2,415 | +107% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 20,555 | 23,442 | +14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,802 | 5,035 | +80% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 5,875 | 5,184 | -12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,122 | 2,618 | +133% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 19,277 | 12,414 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,916 | 4,213 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 19,989 | 20,886 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,045 | 5,128 | +68% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→fail | 5,784 | 3,643 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,077 | 2,478 | +130% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 15,745 | 19,553 | +24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,499 | 4,511 | +81% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 3,594 | 8,844 | +146% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 667 | 2,492 | +274% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 15,730 | 16,422 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,768 | 4,921 | +78% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 9,035 | 3,435 | -62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 681 | 2,415 | +255% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 5,609 | 9,526 | +70% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,013 | 2,585 | +155% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 10,197 | 8,184 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,699 | 3,237 | +91% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 9,387 | 8,159 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 800 | 2,377 | +197% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 15,702 | 23,888 | +52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,550 | 5,150 | +102% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 8,267 | 9,060 | +10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 551 | 2,459 | +346% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +14 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.