Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →majiayu000/skill-audit
Audit, design, categorize, distribute, and measure agent skills using lessons from Anthropic's Lessons from building Claude Code: How we use skills.
Passed 21 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 7 of 22 without it.
and 18 more in the full report
14 fixed7 passed either way1 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 14 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Which reference file should an auditor consult in Step 2 of the workflow to determine the proper category classification for a candidate skill?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Names references/skill-taxonomy.md as the classification reference. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Use this skill to audit existing skills, turn workflow knowledge into useful
agent skills, and review skill libraries at the strategy level. It complements
skill-creator: use this skill to decide what a skill should be, how it should
fit a library, and what needs improvement; use skill-creator when the user
wants the concrete SKILL.md implementation and eval loop.
This workflow is based on Anthropic's June 3, 2026 blog post, "Lessons from building Claude Code: How we use skills": https://claude.com/blog/lessons-from-building-claude-code-how-we-use-skills
A good skill is not "some markdown about a topic." It is a compact extension point that gives the agent non-obvious domain knowledge, reusable files, deterministic helpers, setup rules, verification habits, and guardrails at the moment they matter.
Create or improve a skill only when at least one of these is true:
Do not make a skill when the content only restates obvious coding behavior, generic best practices, or one-off instructions.
Read references/skill-taxonomy.md and classify the candidate into exactly one
primary category. If it appears to span several categories, tighten the scope or
split it.
test cases passed, vs 7 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.