.NET Code Analysis

.NET Code Analysis

Trigger On

• the repo wants first-party .NET analyzers
• CI should fail on analyzer warnings
• the team needs AnalysisLevel or AnalysisMode guidance
• the repo needs a gradual Roslyn warning promotion strategy

Do Not Use For

• third-party analyzer selection by itself
• formatting-only work

Inputs

• the nearest AGENTS.md
• project files or Directory.Build.props
• current analyzer severity policy

Hard Rules for AI Agents

Non-negotiable. Violating these undermines the user's explicit intent.

1. Never disable or remove TreatWarningsAsErrors or WarningsAsErrors if the project has set them. Do not comment them out, set to false, wrap in a condition, or add <TreatWarningsAsErrors>false</TreatWarningsAsErrors> to make the build pass.
2. Never add <NoWarn> or #pragma warning disable for warnings the user chose to treat as errors, unless the user explicitly approves the suppression.
3. Never silently downgrade severity in .editorconfig (e.g. error to warning or none) to make a build succeed.
4. If warnings-as-errors breaks the build — fix the code. If the fix is too large, ask the user whether to defer that warning ID.
5. If warning volume is too large to fix in one pass — report count and categories to the user and ask which to tackle first. Do not unilaterally disable the policy.

Workflow

flowchart TD
    A[Start] --> B{New or legacy project?}
    B -->|New| C[TreatWarningsAsErrors=true immediately]
    B -->|Legacy| D[dotnet build, count warnings by ID]
    D --> E{"< 30 warnings?"}
    E -->|Yes| F[Fix all, then enable TreatWarningsAsErrors]
    E -->|No| G[Report counts to user, ask which batch first]