.NET Router Skill

Trigger On

• the user asks for general .NET help without naming a narrower framework or tool
• implementing, debugging, reviewing, or refactoring C# or .NET code in a repo with multiple app models or frameworks
• deciding which .NET skill should own a task before editing code
• tasks that combine platform work with testing, quality, architecture, setup, or migration decisions

Workflow

1. Detect the real stack first:

• target frameworks and SDK version
• LangVersion
• project SDKs and workload hints
• hosting model and app entry points
• test framework and runner
• analyzers, formatters, coverage, and CI quality gates

1. Route to the narrowest platform skill as soon as the stack is known:

• Web: aspnet-core, minimal-apis, web-api, blazor, signalr, grpc
• Cloud and hosting: aspire, azure-functions, worker-services
• Desktop and client: maui, wpf, winforms, winui
• Data and distributed: entity-framework-core, entity-framework6, orleans
• AI and agentic: semantic-kernel, microsoft-extensions-ai, microsoft-agent-framework, mlnet, mixed-reality
• Legacy: legacy-aspnet, wcf, workflow-foundation

1. Route cross-cutting work to the companion skill instead of keeping it inside generic .NET advice:

• project bootstrap or repo shape: project-setup, architecture
• frontend asset analysis in mixed .NET plus Node repos: eslint, stylelint, htmlhint, webhint, biome, sonarjs, metalint, chous
• code review: code-review
• language features: modern-csharp
• testing: tunit, xunit, mstest
• format, analyzers, coverage, and CI: format, code-analysis, quality-ci, coverlet, reportgenerator
• maintainability and architecture rules: complexity, netarchtest, archunitnet

1. If more than one specialized skill applies, prefer the one closest to the user-visible behavior first, then pull in the quality or tooling skill second.
2. Do not stop at this skill once a narrower match exists. This skill should classify and hand off, not become a generic dumping ground.
3. After code changes, validate with the repository's actual build, test, and quality workflow instead of generic .NET commands.

Current Upstream Notes

• .NET 10.0.11 runtime and ASP.NET Core releases are servicing updates. Re-test affected paths such as cgroup-v2 memory limits, Mono native-library resolution, Windows directory enumeration, WASM AOT/lazy-load startup, thread-static initialization, Blazor persisted circuits, and OpenAPI generation rather than changing architecture by default.
• .NET SDK 10.0.400 is the current 10.0.4xx feature band. It expands file-based app support, adds Microsoft.Testing.Platform project/solution selection to dotnet test, accepts @ as the dotnet new option separator, and includes hardlink and up-to-date build fixes. Keep global.json, workloads, and CI images aligned before adopting the new band.
• The August 2026 "Build apps with .NET" Learn overview remains broad routing context across web, cloud, desktop, mobile, AI, and console workloads; hand off to project-setup, worker-services, aspnet-core, modern-csharp, or another narrow skill as soon as the app model is known.

Routing Heuristics

• If the repo contains Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Web, start from a web skill, not generic .NET.
• If the repo contains Blazor, Razor Components, or .razor pages, prefer blazor.
• If the repo contains package.json, frontend lint configs, or browser-facing asset pipelines inside the .NET solution, prefer the dedicated frontend analysis skills instead of generic .NET.
• If the repo contains Orleans grains or silo hosting, prefer orleans.
• If the repo is mostly analyzers, CI, or coverage work, prefer the quality skill directly.
• If the user asks about “which skill should I use?”, answer with the narrowest matching skill and explain why in one short sentence.
• If no narrower skill matches, keep the work here and stay explicit about the missing specialization.

Deliver

• the correct specialized skill choice for the task
• repo-compatible code or documentation changes that stay aligned with the detected stack
• validation evidence that matches the real project runner and quality toolchain

Validate

• the chosen downstream skill actually exists in the catalog
• platform assumptions match project SDKs, packages, and workloads
• generic guidance has been replaced by framework-specific guidance whenever possible
• runner-specific commands are not mixed incorrectly
• language or runtime features are only used when the repo supports them

Documentation

References

• references/routing.md - Decision tree for routing tasks to specialized .NET skills, including app model classification and cross-cutting concern handling.
• references/detection.md - Project detection patterns for identifying SDK types, target frameworks, workloads, language versions, and app models.