Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →mattpocock/ask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Passed 23 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 4 of 23 without it.
and 32 more in the full report
19 fixed4 passed either way0 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 19 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
I just cloned a fresh repository and want to run our engineering workflows for the first time. Before executing any feature discovery or triage steps, what prerequisite setup command must be executed to configure issue tracking, triage labels, and doc structures?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Recommends /setup-matt-pocock-skills prior to running initial engineering workflows. | Missed | Passed |
| Specifies that setup configures issue tracking and doc layout structures. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
You don't remember every skill, so ask.
Before stating what a skill does or recommending a step be skipped, read that skill's SKILL.md: the summaries here are for orientation only.
A flow is a path through the skills. Most paths run along one main flow, and two on-ramps merge onto it. Everything else is standalone, or a vocabulary layer that runs underneath.
The route most work travels. You have an idea and want it built.
/grill-with-docs sharpens the idea by interview. Start here whenever you are working in a working directory: it's stateful, retaining what it learns in GLOSSARY.md and ADRs. (No working directory? Use /grill-me instead, covered under Standalone. Both run the same /grilling primitive; grill-with-docs is the one that leaves a paper trail, which makes it the better of the two whenever a repo is there to leave it in.)
Branch: can you settle every question in conversation? If a question needs a runnable answer (state, business logic, a UI you have to see), detour through a prototype, bridged by /handoff in both directions (a prototype lives in its own directory, which is exactly what /handoff is for; see Phase boundaries):
/handoff out, then open a fresh session against that file,/prototype to answer the question with throwaway code,/handoff back what you learned, and reference it from the original idea thread.Branch: is this a multi-session build?
/to-spec (turn the thread into a spec), then /to-tickets to split it into tracer-bullet tickets, each declaring its blocking edges. Then work the tickets one of two ways:
/implement per ticket, /clearing context between each one. On a local tracker that's one file per ticket under .scratch/<feature>/issues/, worked blockers-first by hand; on a real tracker the edges become native blocking links, so any ticket whose blockers are done can be grabbed. Each ticket is self-contained, so the last one's context is disposable./implement-spec for the whole spec in one run. It reads the tickets as a task graph, runs implementer subagents across the ready frontier in parallel, and lands everything on one integration branch. Reach for it when you'd rather orchestrate the build than drive each ticket yourself./implement right here, in the same context window.Either way, the code gets built by driving /tdd (one red-green slice at a time) and closes out with /code-review, a two-axis review (Standards + Spec) of the diff. /implement runs both per ticket; /implement-spec's implementers each drive /tdd, and it runs one /code-review over the integration branch. Reach for /tdd on its own when you just want to build a concrete behaviour test-first without a full spec, and /code-review on its own whenever you want to review a branch or PR against a fixed point.
When the work goes up as a pull request, /pr shapes the body: the smallest visual that shows the change, before/after evidence that it works, and a one-way or two-way door call. It's model-invoked, so the agent reaches for it whenever it writes a PR.
/retro closes the loop. After a build, and especially one that went sideways, it looks back over the session and suggests changes to the agent's environment, not the code: navigation pointers, automated checks, the coding standards /code-review enforces, steering files, tooling. Mechanical mistakes become deterministic checks; judgement calls become coding standards. The next build then starts from a better environment.
Keep steps 1–3 in one unbroken context window (don't compact or clear until after /to-tickets) so the grilling, spec, and tickets all build on the same thinking. Each /implement then starts fresh, working from the ticket. Run /retro in the session it's looking back on, before you clear; after clearing, point it at that session's log instead.
The limit on this is the smart zone: the window (~150k tokens on state-of-the-art models) within which the model still reasons sharply. If a session approaches it before /to-tickets, don't push on degraded; /compact at the nearest phase boundary and carry on (see Phase boundaries).
A starting situation that generates work, then merges onto the main flow.
/triage. It moves issues through triage roles and produces agent-ready issues, which /implement later picks up.test cases passed, vs 4 / 23 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.