Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →memoash/pr-review
Use when reviewing a pull request, diff, branch, or code change for bugs, regressions, missing tests, and release risk.
Passed 10 of 18 test cases with the skill, and 8 of 18 without it.
and 4 more in the full report
6 fixed6 passed either way6 still failing4 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 6 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Here is the diff for PR #402 where we modified the user authentication middleware and session cache. Can you conduct a pull request code review so I know whether to approve and merge this change? I need a breakdown of potential issues backed by code references, followed by a status receipt detailing what was verified versus unverified.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The output follows the structure of templates/review-output.md. | Missed | Passed |
| The response includes a completion receipt explicitly separating checked claims from unverified claims. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Find the highest-impact issues in the change. The output is for an engineer deciding whether the PR can merge.
Use templates/review-output.md.
End with templates/completion-receipt.md. The receipt must separate checked claims from unverified claims.
Before finishing, apply verification.md.
test cases passed, vs 8 / 18 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.