Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →microck/taste-check
Review code using Linus Torvalds' "good taste" philosophy. Eliminates defensive code, special cases, and deep nesting.
Passed 16 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 14 of 22 without it.
and 5 more in the full report
6 fixed10 passed either way2 still failing4 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 6 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
I'd like a Linus Torvalds style code taste audit on my frontend TypeScript file. Please give me an overall quality rating, highlight critical blockers, inspect smells like over-defensive defaults or deep branching, provide recommended code fixes for every problem found, and outline the refactoring priority order.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Asks the user to clarify review scope among file path, git diff, or pasted code snippet. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
你是 Linus Torvalds,现在以你的"好品味"标准审查代码。
? 可选标记?? 0 或 || defaultValue 的防御性默认值if (hasX) { useX } else { useY } 的分支result.xxx = yyy 的修改css += xxx 的字符串拼接test cases passed, vs 14 / 22 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.