Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →mims-harvard/tooluniverse-adverse-event-detection
Detect and analyze adverse drug event signals using FDA FAERS reports, drug labels, and disproportionality statistics (PRR, ROR, IC). Generates quantitative safety signal scores (0-100) with evidence grading.
5 of 22 test cases passed with the skill.
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
Lift withheld: 5 comparable cases; this report requires 8.
A test case the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Grade the evidence level for an adverse reaction that is currently documented in an FDA Boxed Warning versus an adverse reaction identified purely through in silico ADMET computational prediction.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Assigns tier T1 evidence grade to FDA Boxed Warnings. | Missed | Passed |
| Assigns tier T4 evidence grade to computational predictions. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
When analysis requires computation (statistics, data processing, scoring, enrichment), write and run Python code via Bash. Don't describe what you would do — execute it and report actual results. Use ToolUniverse tools to retrieve data, then Python (pandas, scipy, statsmodels, matplotlib) to analyze it.
Automated pipeline for detecting, quantifying, and contextualizing adverse drug event signals using FAERS disproportionality analysis, FDA label mining, mechanism-based prediction, and literature evidence. Produces a quantitative Safety Signal Score (0-100) for regulatory and clinical decision-making.
KEY PRINCIPLES:
REASONING STRATEGY — Start Here: Start with the signal: What adverse event was reported more than expected? (PRR >= 2.0, N >= 3, lower CI > 1.0 is the threshold). Then ask three questions in order:
OpenTargets_get_drug_mechanisms_of_action_by_chemblId and drugbank_get_targets_by_drug_name_or_drugbank_id to check targets before asserting plausibility.Causality Assessment — Naranjo Algorithm Reasoning: When determining whether an adverse event is drug-caused (not just associated), apply these steps systematically. LOOK UP DON'T GUESS — search FAERS and FDA labels for each criterion:
FDA_get_adverse_reactions_by_drug_name) and literature (PubMed_search_articles). Yes = +1.FAERS_stratify_by_demographics for time-to-onset data.drugbank_get_drug_interactions_by_drug_name_or_id for interacting drugs.Reference files (in this directory):
PHASE_DETAILS.md - Detailed tool calls, code examples, and output templates per phaseREPORT_TEMPLATE.md - Full report template and completeness checklistTOOL_REFERENCE.md - Tool parameter reference and fallback chainsQUICK_START.md - Quick examples and common drug namestest cases passed with the skill
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.