Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →mims-harvard/tooluniverse-gwas-finemapping
Statistical fine-mapping of GWAS loci using credible sets (SuSiE, FINEMAP) and locus-to-gene scoring (Open Targets L2G). Identifies likely causal variants and target genes — distinct from positional 'nearest gene' which is often wrong.
Passed 7 of 13 test cases with the skill, and 8 of 13 without it.
2 fixed10 passed either way7 still failing3 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 2 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
We need to query Bayesian fine-mapping credible sets specifically for variant rs7903146 across published studies. Which Open Targets tool endpoint provides this variant-centric credible set lookup?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Names or calls OpenTargets_get_variant_credible_sets to inspect variant-level credible set memberships | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
When analysis requires computation (statistics, data processing, scoring, enrichment), write and run Python code via Bash. Don't describe what you would do — execute it and report actual results. Use ToolUniverse tools to retrieve data, then Python (pandas, scipy, statsmodels, matplotlib) to analyze it.
Identify and prioritize causal variants at GWAS loci using statistical fine-mapping and locus-to-gene predictions.
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identify genomic regions associated with traits, but linkage disequilibrium (LD) makes it difficult to pinpoint the causal variant. Fine-mapping uses Bayesian statistical methods to compute the posterior probability that each variant is causal, given the GWAS summary statistics.
REASONING STRATEGY — Start Here: Fine-mapping asks: which variant at this locus is CAUSAL? Work through this chain:
This skill provides tools to:
A credible set is a minimal set of variants that contains the causal variant with high confidence (typically 95% or 99%). Each variant in the set has a posterior probability of being causal, computed using methods like:
The probability that a specific variant is causal, given the GWAS data and LD structure. Higher posterior probability = more likely to be causal.
L2G scores integrate multiple data types to predict which gene is affected by a variant:
test cases passed, vs 8 / 13 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.