Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Workspace metrics dashboard. Tracks growth rate, connection density, pipeline throughput, health score trends, budget consumption, and agent utilization over time. Includes trend detection for spotting degradation or acceleration. Triggers on: "stats", "metrics", "dashboard", "workspace numbers"
.claude/skills/miosa-osa-stats/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 227% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 41% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 9% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -13% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 7% | 0% |
> Workspace metrics dashboard with trend detection.
Quantify the state and trajectory of your workspace. Track how fast the knowledge base is growing, how well-connected it is, how much processing throughput the pipeline achieves, whether health is improving or degrading, and how efficiently agents are consuming budget. Designed for weekly reviews and operational awareness.
bash# Full metrics dashboard /stats # Specific metric category /stats growth # Stats for a time period /stats --period 2026-03 # Stats with trend analysis /stats --trends # Compare two periods /stats --compare 2026-02 2026-03 # Export for reporting /stats --format markdown --output monthly-report.md # Agent utilization stats /stats agents
| Subcommand | Description | |------------|-------------| | (default) | Full dashboard — all categories | | growth | Knowledge base growth metrics | | connections | Graph density and connection metrics | | pipeline | Processing pipeline throughput | | health | Health score trend | | budget | Budget consumption and efficiency | | agents | Agent utilization and productivity |
| Flag | Type | Default | Description | |------|------|---------|-------------| | --period | string | current-month | Time period: today, this-week, YYYY-MM, date range | | --trends | flag | false | Include trend analysis (requires historical data) | | --compare | string | — | Compare against another period | | --format | enum | terminal | terminal, markdown, json, csv | | --output | path | stdout | Write to file | | --scope | string | all | all, node:<name> |
--trends, compute 7-day and 30-day moving averages. Detect: acceleration (metric growing faster), deceleration (slowing), degradation (metric declining), stability.--compare, compute deltas between periods.markdown## Workspace Stats — March 2026 ### Growth | Metric | Value | Trend (30d) | |--------|-------|-------------| | Total files | 287 | +34 (+13%) | | Total words | 142,800 | +18,400 (+15%) | | Claims extracted | 891 | +127 (+17%) | | Signals processed | 43 | +12 (+39%) | | Context updates | 28 | +8 (+40%) | ### Connection Density | Metric | Value | Trend | |--------|-------|-------| | Entities | 156 | +14 | | Edges | 423 | +67 (+19%) | | Density | 0.035 | +0.003 | | Avg degree | 5.4 | +0.6 | | Clustering coeff | 0.42 | stable | | Orphan rate | 4.2% | -1.1% (improving) | ### Pipeline Throughput | Metric | Value | Trend | |--------|-------|-------| | Items processed | 43 | — | | Avg processing time | 2m 18s | -12s (improving) | | Throughput | 1.4 items/day | +0.3 | | Pipeline errors | 2 | -1 | | Reduction quality | 0.84 | stable | ### Health Score | Date | Score | Delta | |------|-------|-------| | Mar 20 | 78 | — | | Mar 13 | 72 | +6 | | Mar 06 | 65 | +7 | | Feb 28 | 68 | -3 | Trend: improving (+13 over 30 days) ### Budget (March) | Metric | Value | |--------|-------| | Tokens consumed | 1,234,567 | | Total cost | $42.18 | | Cost per task | $1.84 | | Cost per claim | $0.047 | | Budget utilization | 67% | ### Agent Utilization | Agent | Tasks | Avg Time | Idle % | Budget Eff | |-------|-------|----------|--------|------------| | researcher | 12 | 24m | 18% | 0.89 | | writer | 8 | 38m | 34% | 0.76 | | analyst | 6 | 52m | 22% | 0.71 | | coder | 15 | 18m | 12% | 0.93 |
/health — Health score data/budget — Budget consumption data| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 13,088 | 12,895 | -1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,172 | 3,832 | +227% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 15,412 | 11,007 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,790 | 3,454 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | 7,226 | 7,364 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,322 | 2,421 | +83% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 8,101 | 3,162 | -61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,334 | 1,876 | +41% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 9,533 | 2,450 | -74% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,652 | 1,802 | +9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 12,018 | 2,235 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,049 | 1,791 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 9,782 | 2,389 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,636 | 1,748 | +7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 10,056 | 3,517 | -65% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,539 | 1,792 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 11,431 | 3,826 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,280 | 2,072 | -9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 11,215 | 7,381 | -34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,964 | 2,795 | +42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 7,789 | 2,701 | -65% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,302 | 1,750 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 4,434 | 1,964 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 717 | 1,621 | +126% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 10,985 | 8,918 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,935 | 2,894 | +50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 8,241 | 1,580 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,311 | 1,562 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-24 | fail→fail | 6,360 | 8,329 | +31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,062 | 2,739 | +158% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 15,317 | 2,277 | -85% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,488 | 1,715 | -31% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 14,145 | 11,573 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,476 | 3,423 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | 11,874 | 1,892 | -84% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,702 | 1,615 | -5% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 16,039 | 7,277 | -55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,471 | 2,610 | +6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 12,460 | 6,212 | -50% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,183 | 2,572 | +18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 11,856 | 2,654 | -78% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,998 | 1,749 | -12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 13,505 | 3,563 | -74% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,218 | 2,000 | -10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | 5,276 | 6,899 | +31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 814 | 2,393 | +194% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | 11,288 | 14,189 | +26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,866 | 3,714 | +99% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 24 cases were attempted, and 23 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +46 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.