Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Infer gene regulatory networks (GRNs) from gene expression data using scalable algorithms (GRNBoost2, GENIE3). Use when analyzing transcriptomics data (bulk RNA-seq, single-cell RNA-seq) to identify transcription factor-target gene relationships and regulatory interactions. Supports distributed computation for large-scale datasets.
.claude/skills/mkurman-arboreto/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 163% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 24% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 24% | 0% |
| case-23 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | -17% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 16% | 0% |
--|-------------| | TF | Transcription factor (regulator) | | target | Target gene | | importance | Regulatory importance score (higher = stronger) |
Filtering strategy:
Arboreto is a core component of the SCENIC pipeline for single-cell regulatory network analysis:
python# Step 1: Use arboreto for GRN inference from arboreto.algo import grnboost2 network = grnboost2(expression_data=sc_data, tf_names=tf_list) # Step 2: Use pySCENIC for regulon identification and activity scoring # (See pySCENIC documentation for downstream analysis)
Always set a seed for reproducible results:
pythonnetwork = grnboost2(expression_data=matrix, seed=777)
Run multiple seeds for robustness analysis:
pythonfrom distributed import LocalCluster, Client if __name__ == '__main__': client = Client(LocalCluster()) seeds = [42, 123, 777] networks = [] for seed in seeds: net = grnboost2(expression_data=matrix, client_or_address=client, seed=seed) networks.append(net) # Combine networks and filter consensus links consensus = analyze_consensus(networks)
Memory errors: Reduce dataset size by filtering low-variance genes or use distributed computing
Slow performance: Use GRNBoost2 instead of GENIE3, enable distributed client, filter TF list
Dask errors: Ensure if __name__ == '__main__': guard is present in scripts
Empty results: Check data format (genes as columns), verify TF names match gene names
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-23 | pass→pass | 5,529 | 2,446 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,019 | 848 | -17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | 31,059 | 12,758 | -59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,162 | 3,051 | +163% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 21,376 | 21,240 | -1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,789 | 4,685 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 17,319 | 14,295 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,177 | 3,261 | +3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 14,000 | 14,343 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,521 | 2,915 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 11,690 | 12,110 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,118 | 2,633 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 4,413 | 4,053 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 728 | 1,158 | +59% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 5,252 | 3,372 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,015 | 1,033 | +2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 5,739 | 4,417 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,011 | 1,168 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 15,451 | 13,341 | -14% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,615 | 2,781 | +6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 13,585 | 13,314 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,398 | 2,776 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 6,568 | 3,872 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,080 | 1,040 | -4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 11,638 | 11,098 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,072 | 2,430 | +17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 14,148 | 11,016 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,419 | 2,339 | -3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 14,666 | 12,303 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,326 | 2,576 | +11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 5,845 | 6,047 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,017 | 1,504 | +48% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 5,857 | 3,213 | -45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,134 | 1,020 | -10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 9,470 | 5,351 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,485 | 1,289 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | 11,307 | 16,271 | +44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,947 | 3,223 | +66% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 12,280 | 12,440 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,192 | 2,653 | +21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 14,593 | 8,775 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,503 | 1,939 | -23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 12,815 | 8,815 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,033 | 1,979 | -3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 3,775 | 2,403 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 617 | 830 | +35% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted, and 22 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +13 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.