Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →When a founder needs demo scripts, discovery call frameworks, objection handling, RFP/RFI responses, competitive feature matrices, POC planning, or closing playbooks. Activate for sales calls, demo prep, talk tracks, bid responses, competitor comparisons, or pre-sales engineering.
.claude/skills/mkurman-sales-script/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 32% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 36% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 26% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 37% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 25% | 0% |
-|----------|------------| | Rapport & agenda | 3 min | Set the agenda, confirm time, build quick rapport | | Situation questions | 7 min | Understand their current state and workflow | | Problem questions | 8 min | Dig into pain points, frequency, and impact | | Implication questions | 5 min | Explore the cost of not solving the problem | | Need-payoff questions | 4 min | Let them articulate the value of a solution | | Next steps | 3 min | Summarize, confirm fit, schedule the demo |
Pre-demo checklist: Environment tested, sample data loaded, backup environment ready, screen sharing tested, browser tabs pre-loaded, network/VPN verified, customer branding applied.
Attendee mapping: For each attendee, document their title, role in evaluation (decision maker / champion / technical evaluator / end user), and key interest area.
| Segment | Duration | Content | |---------|----------|---------| | Opening | 5 min | Thank attendees, recap discovery findings, set agenda | | Use Case 1 | 7 min | Primary pain point demo with business context and differentiator highlights | | Check-in | 2 min | "How does this compare to how you handle it today?" | | Use Case 2 | 7 min | Secondary pain point demo | | Use Case 3 | 6 min | Differentiator or delight feature they did not expect | | Integration demo | 10 min | Show connector setup, data flow, end-to-end workflow | | Admin & security | 5 min | RBAC, audit logs, SSO | | Q&A | 5 min | Handle live questions | | Close | 5 min | Summarize value, propose next steps with specific dates |
Demo principles: Demo after discovery, never before. Use their terminology and data. Leave time for questions. Share why you built the feature — origin stories resonate more than feature walkthroughs.
| Category | Example Objection | Response Strategy | |----------|------------------|-------------------| | Price | "Too expensive" | Reframe as ROI. "What is the cost of not solving this?" | | Timing | "Not the right time" | Uncover the real blocker. "What would need to change?" | | Competition | "We use X already" | Differentiate on their specific pain point | | Authority | "Need to check with my boss" | Enable the champion with materials they need | | Status quo | "What we have works" | Quantify hidden cost. Share a peer story. | | Trust | "You are too small" | Lead with proof: customers, metrics, investors, team |
If demo breaks: switch to backup, explain what they would have seen, offer recorded follow-up. If question derails: acknowledge, note for follow-up, return to script. If audience disengages: pause and ask "Is this addressing what you need?", skip to most relevant section.
Send thank-you email with recording within 24 hours. Share demo environment access. Send follow-up addressing unanswered questions. Schedule next meeting. Update CRM with demo notes and next steps. Log objections for battlecard updates.
cold-outreach — Use to generate the meetings that lead to these sales conversationsproposal-generation — Use after a successful demo to create the formal proposal, SOW, or contractPrompt: "I have a demo tomorrow with the Head of Engineering at a fintech. They care about reducing deployment failures."
Good demo opening output: > "Thanks for making time, Name]. Last week you mentioned your team spends about 8 hours per sprint dealing with failed deployments and rollbacks. You said the biggest pain is that it slows release velocity and frustrates the team. Is that still the top priority, or has anything changed? > > Great. I want to show you three specific workflows that address deployment reliability. About 25 minutes, with time for your questions. Sound good? > > Let me start with how Similar Fintech Customer] handled this before switching to us..."
Prompt: "We got an RFP from a large enterprise. Should we bid?"
Good output snippet:
RFP Coverage Analysis:
- Overall coverage score: 68% (Conditional Bid range)
- Must-have gaps: 2 (within threshold)
- Recommendation: CONDITIONAL BID
Action items before proceeding:
1. Confirm planned roadmap items cover the 2 must-have gaps
2. Build differentiator narrative around your 3 strongest categories
3. Flag gaps to product team for timeline confirmation| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | pass→pass | 17,368 | 6,600 | -62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,442 | 2,336 | -4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 22,570 | 17,266 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,678 | 4,084 | +11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 15,693 | 11,264 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,303 | 3,050 | +32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 14,081 | 8,339 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,126 | 2,537 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 9,454 | 3,713 | -61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,379 | 1,879 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 16,397 | 11,802 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,539 | 3,195 | +26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 12,858 | 10,094 | -21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,866 | 2,745 | +47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 11,141 | 7,897 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,534 | 2,378 | +55% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 10,280 | 9,635 | -6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,553 | 2,683 | +73% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | 15,652 | 14,168 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,334 | 3,337 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 13,332 | 11,273 | -15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,938 | 2,914 | +50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 13,836 | 10,968 | -21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,134 | 2,914 | +37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 11,846 | 8,979 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,607 | 2,582 | +61% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 11,514 | 4,845 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,635 | 2,038 | +25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→fail | 15,181 | 15,325 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,367 | 3,586 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | 14,227 | 11,325 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,164 | 2,942 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 13,375 | 9,801 | -27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,926 | 2,754 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 12,284 | 10,416 | -15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,845 | 2,771 | +50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 12,166 | 9,644 | -21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,928 | 2,762 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 11,259 | 10,437 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,655 | 2,755 | +66% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 12,905 | 11,623 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,188 | 3,169 | +45% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 3,691 | 3,667 | -1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 743 | 2,055 | +177% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +18 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.